Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next steps

Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com> Thu, 25 July 2019 10:32 UTC

Return-Path: <marie@mjmontpetit.com>
X-Original-To: loops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: loops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1296E12012E for <loops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 03:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mjmontpetit-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5dY0l5YUaXua for <loops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 03:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF5291201F8 for <loops@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 03:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id s7so96032296iob.11 for <loops@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 03:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mjmontpetit-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JzQawyr8OyIvBK8X1BVd989x+K+oz78eCKbCrE/nSr0=; b=yGwuuK5YRDEpW/8Dpvgjk7bBRxbmU61gFSPfpO7un62a0fojcdqj0X/HVXtXPDOGql DWeYQ0iryUe/3Jdrx7pwf0sOLtHCmvvziHQx1XH8MgpTRgbhcduPlpnauQmXblkwo4T3 saHmxpiGhHPEYK7yHMbrp3kXouO2/m++r4OOCXud1aSdxBuWE+7bo5kv/8/v4u/NrF4A sd/MLHih+lmnO+3n0QT+30mNrctWbqk6sY9v1q2xBni83+zr+DHJmQs90Wm9FJyhXgZN T37n1yXnteAruN7VIsGTYig6TZdvTxhrICFIxp63+Q53T2adGY0UtJ7TVw5K18UV4Jhi bSXA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JzQawyr8OyIvBK8X1BVd989x+K+oz78eCKbCrE/nSr0=; b=SBckic8K8NI0ksUU6mj0mMP3h9eTg6H9vjsbB1BRBF3Dm8VQy7bW37HaghzP0ijE+d n3R58BbTd7Emsokzr5bkAr08WWxGQBGegL6SuER8+mu0BMywUMESwz+x6Hi7EFal7Iha 5XqT3HyxkaABoZs4ypiJjOyx+Zw77IgnkFIOO/58hCJbEngdLv9945dwq/B/48vfnEyi BYhdXVi6bsIsoA7iT6Ss5Cm561fBqMnf0tsiJ8OAb9H4cTOj7BdiuH5S9aA5RypvXzzi XLsaiUVwrif46RZUJnkce9HhTSCHRUT3S0QpcJmEN/+fNV0eSnTx4MFpYF8ifHIVXAgP 5Ndw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUWrdA3X+TOtckDV1ivH2cAAoYJ3wHfQZnW5Q6ZN0/Nu3y65Bd0 TLjhsIWVYSG7LJ/LNx8CHNmtTqjmk+w9rmvsFZs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyXqBoqYmn5pcz43vZGtyu75q/E+F3ejyXZtwgUw+YiLj2cIXtmsjp7lRFPuLo51mTEIoUQJmGxMTRuSXyRn1Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:96d8:: with SMTP id r24mr19188451iol.269.1564050765273; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 03:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 03:32:44 -0700
From: Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com>
In-Reply-To: <E6659E42-D6D7-4033-B4D6-9305823063D2@tzi.org>
References: <CAKKJt-eRGJe+9PtEC7xgFz+HA0zsr_sR0NUgKRmJ-P5Q3XBg-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPjWiCSbPioTHkYBpX73qxzO=H1sJDZpCMCKzBKoU4rZLLhwMQ@mail.gmail.com> <E6659E42-D6D7-4033-B4D6-9305823063D2@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 03:32:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPjWiCS9bGTaq_wXteS_fDH+zA6+Za8pMyfV37SaNKT6VMV9nw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: loops@ietf.org, Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004673a4058e7ef28f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/loops/JdWMZ1ErDr8apUSm_3qKa4A87_c>
Subject: Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next steps
X-BeenThere: loops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Local Optimizations on Path Segments <loops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/loops>, <mailto:loops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/loops/>
List-Post: <mailto:loops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:loops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/loops>, <mailto:loops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 10:32:48 -0000

Actually the wifi to node segment was the original use case fo the nwcrg.

mjm

Marie-José Montpetit, Ph.D.
Research Affiliate, MIT Media Laboratory
mariejose@mjmontpetit.com
mariejo@mit.edu

On July 25, 2019 at 12:56:37 AM, Carsten Bormann (cabo@tzi.org) wrote:

On Jul 24, 2019, at 18:17, Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com>
wrote:
>
> Standardisation of what? The architecture? The protocols (beware there is
already FECFRAME and others)? The proxies?

Hi Marie-José,

details of the thinking that was developed in the side meetings that
happened at the previous two IETF meetings can be found at

https://github.com/loops-wg/charter

The BOF actually added one piece of information I didn’t previously
perceive that way:
People seem to really want to tackle the host-to-node case (as needed,
e.g., for going through WiFi access clouds) right away, not just the
in-network (node-to-node) case. That would be the one thing I would change
based on my recollection of the BOF. But of course there may be other
things; it may be worth to now have another round of discussion of the
proposed charter.

Grüße, Carsten