Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo-04 - "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks"

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Sat, 16 April 2022 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A133A18D7; Sat, 16 Apr 2022 09:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OzHEGqcesDNQ; Sat, 16 Apr 2022 09:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52d.google.com (mail-pg1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D61F53A18D5; Sat, 16 Apr 2022 09:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id s137so11378406pgs.5; Sat, 16 Apr 2022 09:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UOr1SZp2AEgxtIYGtiLzxvIb7igbpjeJ2LDkRp5tC2g=; b=RlictVNofQ+qbddf5uGh9WAIII1qXvRc9ICWT5prnOTA2PHptAQSvicxMNgYQRBoX2 JLJSVF9tIfmEDSyR2OuWe5Ti++AFk68IO00U3aU/5O/7Z7dG0ZnCOIp4uAToyp/0GL1g 8A6e1U3qklKRqetRWMtPminy1GsmXFeqzUmFnZLAJMLsIl8/5i5MzXoA38EAV6c2N2rU NfwNqrCGK7Vuq+ih7RM3h4eL7f3o1AQqhxj0L4WkCHSeSXm5pIPOgqeOusJjp8HSxJdZ KMA3yiWoozlKqY6JSRa7rQYMJwywoVb68L2u7FV0XAth4oAO8ZkvE/RxQ2L4A3EcUIum dlxg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UOr1SZp2AEgxtIYGtiLzxvIb7igbpjeJ2LDkRp5tC2g=; b=wWEZ1YXwhKGDg2Uk8yY6716z8PGJpXsO5FdlorpnvJ5ZBojJLt2FHN4cxrzkaTnXj3 AaykY88d971lVsQmrHLXJDQrZZCMVMThCBxwFY8s0Ck9w5bvlx5iwPa+W0QR7bpgCoUS DjUNUkmBf0dBfuTr7PrSEauAV+JshXA4L+jru7XKa7MV0CaBJOT1AphXiMjYTwq+u/n9 5/agSa4e0op/O7r+C2yufmDfjckCzeLlXZQYGcT+D2XaAF9xn7XLeOzfYD6rQKLH0Xfk zbbsbyzWo0TBqMyp9McXXIZLBsoAIuq9Sj5Z1KaA6syPTc75pIMJVU9b3+7fHyfTLBgU mOqw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53243Mkw3HKDltjuJa7YEiNwN+P73GcubuXqs+ZyNTIcbcMdpfjN cl9d1AuiiJNa+5WlVvSwG87+CRKm1r/K6rWIdRs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz4WWYU6ccJhVbRAtEpjzJ+3gWSA7SPiD/J8kF5vVVwVO1udD9P/DgbJkcryfibMLTrB+/Ix4xbhiyQ7ldU9vg=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:d10d:0:b0:39c:d17a:7b08 with SMTP id k13-20020a63d10d000000b0039cd17a7b08mr3401908pgg.180.1650125809723; Sat, 16 Apr 2022 09:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <36E526F2-34CB-4C0A-84C2-79A50D9D4C36@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <36E526F2-34CB-4C0A-84C2-79A50D9D4C36@cisco.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 12:16:38 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV1S3sxet7juUEnMsm5uXLJdnsOtqPFpdiC=M=G3=Q7FWA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Peter Psenak <ppsenak=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b92bfb05dcc7da1b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/iwuNyuGvvOIEeDa9S1zxNnjqeSQ>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo-04 - "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks"
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 16:16:56 -0000

I support WG adoption of IP Flex Algo as an extension to the base IGP Flex
Algo.

This is a highly valuable extension for operators that can now apply to any
IP based networks.

One of the major benefits to migrating SR is being  able to use Flex Algo
for network slicing capabilities.

Now with IP Flex Algo you don’t need SR and this has great applicability
for DC NVO constraint based steering capabilities as well as maybe other IP
environments where steering capabilities is desired but you don’t want the
MPLS or SR complexity.

 One follow on question for authors is if IP Flex Algo is used on the same
link with IGP Flex Algo  are there any compatibility issues?

The IP Flex Algo draft I believe should mirror all the sections in the IGP
Flex Algo draft with new Sub TLV defined for IP Flex Algo.  I see the Admin
group coloring sections omitted.  I don’t see why you cannot have admin
group for include and exclude links which I think should apply to IP Flex
Algo as well.

Peter

>From the discussion point #3 with Ketan, Ketan is Ok with the two options
of updates below.

As IP Flex Algo would be an extension to the base IGP Flex Algo please use
update Option #2.

Option #1 This is if each application is standalone per data plane  and is
not an extension and so IGP Flex Algo would not be a base specification.


NEW

>     An IGP Flexible Algorithm (Flex-Algorithm) allows the IGP to compute
>     constraint-based paths. The  IGP Flex-Algorithm specification
>     currently only supports Segment Routing with (SR) data planes - SR
MPLS and
>     SRv6.
>
>     This document specifies IGP Flex-Algorithm, so that it can be used
 in any IP network
>     for native  IPv4 and IPv6 forwarding in the absence of SR.



Option #2 Verbiage if IGP Flex Algo is a base and this draft is an
extension and updates the base.  We don’t have to say IGP Flex Algo
currently only supports dropping the word currently as we are now extending
with IP Flex Algo.

> NEW
>
>     An IGP Flexible Algorithm (Flex-Algorithm) allows the IGP to compute
>     constraint-based paths. The base IGP Flex-Algorithm specification
only supports the  Segment Routing with (SR) data planes - SR MPLS and SRv6.
>
>     This document extends IGP Flex-Algorithm, so that it can be used
>     natively with IPv4 and IPv6 forwarding.


Kind Regards

Gyan

On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 3:07 PM Acee Lindem (acee) <acee=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> This begins a WG last call for draft-ietf-lsr-ip-flexalgo-04.  The draft
> had a lot of support and discussion initially and has been stable for some
> time. Please review and send your comments, support, or objection to this
> list before 12 AM UTC on April 22nd, 2022.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*



*M 301 502-1347*