RE: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka

David Conran wrote:

> >> possibilities are SP and ME, so let's assume that for now.

Frank wrote:
> >
> > Actually, I believe they're planning on proposing RS for Serbia...
> 

Doug wrote:

> I know the Serbian government proposed RS (for "Republic of 
> Serbia"), and I've heard alternatively that ISO (a) supports 
> it or (b) opposes it because of their policy against using 
> words like "Republic" to make the code element.  I guess we 
> won't know for sure until the formal announcement.  In any 
> case, I was just using it for illustration.

Unofficial Country Code Info:

 RS/SRB for Serbia
 ME/MNE for Montenegro

I would expect a newsletter to be published within the next 4-5 weeks
displaying the official results.  I don't expect there to be any changes but
it isn't official until the voting is over and the Newsletter published!  

Best regards

Debbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Ewell [mailto:dewell@adelphia.net] 
> Sent: 21 September 2006 06:20
> To: LTRU Working Group
> Cc: Frank Ellermann
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: zh-hakka
> 
> David Conrad <david dot conrad at icann dot org> wrote:
> 
> >> IANA is not perfect.
> >
> > Indeed.  We apologize for any errors that might have 
> cropped up during 
> > IANA processing of registry modification requests and we'd be very 
> > interested in working with interested parties in improving our 
> > processes such that those errors aren't repeated (this is 
> one of the 
> > reasons why we're doing the internal XMLization -- it 
> enables simpler 
> > automation the registry modifications).
> 
> No problem.  I'm sure you won't mind some extra pairs of eyes 
> to help maintain a high standard of quality.  (BTW, the new 
> 2006-09-20 version of the Registry looks great.)
> 
> >> In the next few weeks, or months or something, ISO 3166/MA will 
> >> decide on new alpha-2 code elements for Serbia and for Montenegro, 
> >> now that they have agreed to break up.  I don't have any inside 
> >> knowledge on what the code elements will be, but two 
> widely reported 
> >> possibilities are SP and ME, so let's assume that for now.
> >
> > Actually, I believe they're planning on proposing RS for Serbia...
> 
> I know the Serbian government proposed RS (for "Republic of 
> Serbia"), and I've heard alternatively that ISO (a) supports 
> it or (b) opposes it because of their policy against using 
> words like "Republic" to make the code element.  I guess we 
> won't know for sure until the formal announcement.  In any 
> case, I was just using it for illustration.
> 
> --
> Doug Ewell
> Fullerton, California, USA
> http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
> RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru