IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation

Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com> Sat, 03 February 2024 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <hrogge@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37AAAC19ECBD for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Feb 2024 09:58:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ALowYk5vQFyc for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Feb 2024 09:58:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD00EC19330B for <manet@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Feb 2024 09:58:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2d09bdddfc9so5685641fa.2 for <manet@ietf.org>; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 09:58:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1706983089; x=1707587889; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=t+GrbJ+nV1UXvlnor/sCerpimmpFT/WvG9S2k3IgkJc=; b=WJspm2FGFCEfZe6igFWZ+o6A6r5p5Ei33Z6rN5Q5zaUaCaCxLycMv0tOt7ViZUlxm/ XGV+ij+yDG+L9y/Zb+zeaZwjpYggLc1D3io++mQNobZqpyLd4daTSYkEgCv0ovaUzWxj q/09z2M9NcOhVWlvUXDIdsylbmIQmX26NdTXKGZ1yF7esObYyZ0eDk9y7WYugH6ovYPY gqCYtj4Db+bbrcMtLd7tSaAeifkKxlo07aaxqu8UhU6yuTPR4zWl/PlakTIOcPLXxeH7 inyzIVSQhgfYLwJ7d/m9E8X15RoxnCFRL58E7ec9X/ajAP8MR+X9EV5lcSj6Vh0tyi4b ve6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706983089; x=1707587889; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=t+GrbJ+nV1UXvlnor/sCerpimmpFT/WvG9S2k3IgkJc=; b=GWob0IUvPk/ltUi9P9jOrrWUhNMj/T++euCN+snA6l3V4zN0EWIP6LA9tX2gKUXeCj UDK0vnUHHyzRGTniPyIAcYMZn7OMBZQhB3lFnv0WOsNJ5cYx23T53keQtM+c7ZV7w75l 33txk5jaTfO+iYV5O2got7RwBJr1swClZZXYBCKucyGE948a60Vqsz2URcjIz9BBqf3j MsEn56VwuVv4GmGip9nL4E+uPHYyktLPdf7413Ec2I+mLZtzN+gPtJ20BADfabN89D9l wMlp6BUz9QxWuO4f0CAEENPEiELveFZAYMH2kKL3OJyzztRKICpiWqecWZtAJp5zBsiR wQFg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzm431HK10yncUC7FXxn9bc5TeAJmI3gmRzf5cUoC+zkxwq1AWU 9iTMBex2L//3w0sXIMrUvFbTfGKOMoUPydQkQ1hUMfz0rl8VInEbDiZM1yNMpFH5MerHqfFQPSL cOn/MtNxnf0+JyRQXVMZyuOHIzg4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHckqCo5YvPosyPapY5PqyR2e4I+cwemCRzX0p5tHkNQI+xhXIhjLT435rxrj9Rbsu/c332G5CeZkRlJmnSiO8=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:c509:0:b0:511:34c0:a34e with SMTP id w9-20020a19c509000000b0051134c0a34emr3419982lfe.66.1706983088970; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 09:58:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <PH7PR14MB5368D3F677021CAFA04831F4BBB1A@PH7PR14MB5368.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <740cf920-605d-4376-9db5-4409794bedb0@computer.org> <CAGnRvur98cmOqrB6b7Q=VsfvrBEY9goWn-zrXWM49mCj-+7zPw@mail.gmail.com> <7334e18e-d2aa-4f99-b79c-869b7ee1c836@computer.org> <87h6l9oqdk.wl-jch@irif.fr> <CAGnRvur17OvFogQnJspv=2ezuE41LQkgj5fEv5mJRGG9iYxZDw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL95ndJoFOay1Spin5vMfZV5KMHO5DkG7KhyHNo6KuAC3vm74w@mail.gmail.com> <875y1mgc9g.wl-jch@irif.fr> <CAGnRvurA7rg1R74-S4OgmFBE-3dqtgurF2=dGqYo69WMn6ynyA@mail.gmail.com> <c8fb9dfe-59d7-49b5-9d4d-33470a79dee8@earthlink.net> <CAGnRvuqKGm6XVLkOOMG28EXuBRXkvTqGVEf-du8q220S3H2aiA@mail.gmail.com> <875xz5mu2d.wl-jch@irif.fr>
In-Reply-To: <875xz5mu2d.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2024 18:57:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGnRvuqPPvZWhO9O4q5kuJQg5Sf=nRtR-3F6wpABXnH+bdiQNg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
Cc: Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>, "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/-_EANHgpQwK5aFfkCtAtHApzbyY>
Subject: Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2024 17:58:12 -0000

On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 4:44 PM Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:
>
> > For detecting a route request for a non-existing route my idea always
> > was to use a TUN device and point a route to the whole MANET (or even
> > the default route) into it.
>
> That's going to work, but it pushes every packet through two kernel-user
> transitions, which makes it unsuitable for production use.
As soon as you set a more specific route, the traffic will not go into
the TUN anymore.

Henning Rogge

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email