Re: [manet] Problems not reports (was Re: AODVv2 implementation)
Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Sun, 28 January 2024 23:41 UTC
Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57A2C14F5FD for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 15:41:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l0YuvDkSmBla for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 15:41:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com (mail-wr1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C6E3C14F5F5 for <manet@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 15:41:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-33ae7ae1c32so665934f8f.3 for <manet@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 15:41:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1706485306; x=1707090106; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oAWBlrrxoqr5rhBsfc/f9svuQLHSP4cD7hpXHKde8AQ=; b=HFDy/F/5mEML3O4tFPMz1+DLrK3zO/NQpeoqu8bae8MZ8eKSc/PYZGbVKK+rFIkBc0 krqVXkFHr086LAUihNIB7xasT0X6+t1SsGrsynZQkXPjS/bxC2SZKBLXYnfb+DLXlkiD mG0jTDgTVm5Ga6rtA2aj2vjnknHU0C883sdaObm8tkcyAechTG6tuBPInCE2CnZPIrjo i2Aiq0J2iwBwXtaZu7+SJFE3vEEgw+DQmuhaRrL5ttOUiXX+RiHUjxCl4YpwwOQfxWJz OwBmGRdYTQJ0Tu6p1Q/aX/md1rvffaoT4i4iggb/LoD1IhUy6n7zb994fOam2ML6TZGI AV+Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706485306; x=1707090106; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=oAWBlrrxoqr5rhBsfc/f9svuQLHSP4cD7hpXHKde8AQ=; b=j9E/2Up1iQl1KoOGer4dRmuDJDm5voq8k3lV4Ne/WGg5AFtr9Igg5ouMP8djNB9G6N X9j2JbJYH0apZGby7KCuDHaqvhUTxBEpK4Cw5pROsqZew1UaczoRc+XeLDSVK8HWmFE0 l/8KI2q0/Wg+ldSA7hKsll+r0xjP/VZ0sKShUEukVoIEq/9I6BH5WYrFwra/kn8d5L0c sOLINR7snBd/lF79Mg5sWjvxeZA4ZTyX6nz0zUjrpmDrTqkRzzDXbSRfAuBkNKuW2NBP SVSsyjifhwCXoFOUz4Q5EUgArM41z6R9wybi8426A+wE9SP89INYGXhvO4eSLdqLDAGk eXqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YygIvz1+BqX8Nq8bN2ENdSGaM595qH3sdIi/kGEWWs1KaFKu4BC FCTedzN3MW8j3lN8JAK7D+B8Y06t1oNl9Wk+lsKbgpe0T7d9krwoOrtbA+A1+6rjHO1C7jBoYzW VvHOdSgdepgQdeJ93NFypW0s38lVtEulChOI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFkODKZ7Kf3CkhXk57PSBu35XYJKuK6YbQw9jREp/r7euRdReT7k1GaSpvvIyWvb0bExXoxs6rkTneiC/qv4U0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:178d:b0:33a:eda4:b6f0 with SMTP id e13-20020a056000178d00b0033aeda4b6f0mr925899wrg.50.1706485305616; Sun, 28 Jan 2024 15:41:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <PH7PR14MB5368D3F677021CAFA04831F4BBB1A@PH7PR14MB5368.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <740cf920-605d-4376-9db5-4409794bedb0@computer.org> <CAGnRvur98cmOqrB6b7Q=VsfvrBEY9goWn-zrXWM49mCj-+7zPw@mail.gmail.com> <7334e18e-d2aa-4f99-b79c-869b7ee1c836@computer.org> <87h6l9oqdk.wl-jch@irif.fr> <CAGnRvur17OvFogQnJspv=2ezuE41LQkgj5fEv5mJRGG9iYxZDw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL95ndJoFOay1Spin5vMfZV5KMHO5DkG7KhyHNo6KuAC3vm74w@mail.gmail.com> <875y1mgc9g.wl-jch@irif.fr> <CAGnRvurA7rg1R74-S4OgmFBE-3dqtgurF2=dGqYo69WMn6ynyA@mail.gmail.com> <B7D07985-DE8C-4B50-81FB-2CA00161CD4B@nrl.navy.mil> <CAF4+nEHJzC4wo4+Ht-PynovdLBsSAMLCycrf4aL0KUABndXm9Q@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ8_31gC5MEziOGGa0EPA+77KcRahgquwrY++FvgVRmVJuA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ8_31gC5MEziOGGa0EPA+77KcRahgquwrY++FvgVRmVJuA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 01:39:16 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8-WSExEj+o_vq5DXNYFSG-cL+XSrV7HRF4TFoQFu92mBg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Henning Rogge <HRogge@gmail.com>
Cc: "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000074ada406100a124d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/jgduXO17418XJOxInVnkTeieQHk>
Subject: Re: [manet] Problems not reports (was Re: AODVv2 implementation)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 23:41:47 -0000
Hi Henning, >>> On 12/4/23, 9:04 AM, "manet on behalf of Henning Rogge" wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> I was thinking about how to implement AODV2 on a TUN but hit an >>> interesting issue when reading through the "Interaction with the >>> Forwarding Plane" chapter of AODVv2... >>> >>> >>> Chapter 6.4: >>> "AODVv2 needs to update the record of when a route was last used to >>> forward a packet". >>> >> Ok this is a requirement for this specification, so is it a problem for this specification to be implemented or not? > >>> >>> Does this mean AODV cannot use the kernel routing forwarding system >>> and is expected to do everything in user space? I ask because the >>> "routing cache" (and its statistics for each route) were removed from >>> Linux in version 3.6. >>> >>> AODV should use kernel routing forwarding system and not required to do everything in user space (please reference requirements within AODVv2 of such user space, because not understood why expected?). Are you reporting problem within Linux specification or reporting problem for AODVv2 implement? not sure which one you started with as the main specification to follow. IMHO better to start with Proposed Routing to implement within its requirements, and to try to make it work within Linux requirements. AB > >>>
- [manet] IETF 118 Minutes available Don Fedyk
- Re: [manet] IETF 118 Minutes available Christopher Dearlove
- Re: [manet] IETF 118 Minutes available Charlie Perkins
- [manet] FW: IETF 118 Minutes available Don Fedyk
- Re: [manet] IETF 118 Minutes available Christopher Dearlove
- Re: [manet] IETF 118 Minutes available Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] IETF 118 Minutes available Christopher Dearlove
- Re: [manet] IETF 118 Minutes available Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] IETF 118 Minutes available Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] IETF 118 Minutes available Christopher Dearlove
- Re: [manet] IETF 118 Minutes available Henning Rogge
- [manet] AODVv2 implementation Charlie Perkins
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Henning Rogge
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Anders Nilsson Plymoth
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Henning Rogge
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Christopher Dearlove
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation bebemaster
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Henning Rogge
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Christopher Dearlove
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Henning Rogge
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Adamson, Robert B CIV USN NRL (5592) Washington DC (USA)
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Donald Eastlake
- [manet] Kernel hooks for AODVv2 [was: AODVv2 impl… Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] Problems not reports (was Re: AODVv2 … Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] Problems not reports (was Re: AODVv2 … Christopher Dearlove
- Re: [manet] Kernel hooks for AODVv2 [was: AODVv2 … Charlie Perkins
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Charlie Perkins
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Henning Rogge
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Charlie Perkins
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Donald Eastlake
- [manet] Problems not reports (was Re: AODVv2 impl… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] Problems not reports (was Re: AODVv2 … Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [manet] Kernel hooks for AODVv2 [was: AODVv2 … Henning Rogge
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Henning Rogge
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Henning Rogge
- Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation Charlie Perkins