Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation

Abdussalam Baryun <> Sun, 26 November 2023 06:59 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76349C14CE4D for <>; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 22:59:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UOwWi20SG9Ij for <>; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 22:59:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E793C14E515 for <>; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 22:59:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2c8880fbb33so41278481fa.0 for <>; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 22:59:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20230601; t=1700981979; x=1701586779;; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XzZbSoB0MgnfUOQGvWmnOTw+WEdcAXrLdBCYYGb0Pao=; b=bPJau+WpKDpLolgTU/qO/ut6RWzdfNZQzX5NNtpt9bv1r+kLRPDtUHXUMlcLoPv66d wdXcacWDDarig74DKVO9icUHdNPV90kNMNhDMdxF+mlWexBtJlA2BDhg+xVLJ2BnX55e RIwANKpMutA+nMOS1p3io/0MogaFrl+qctZSI6kHqK/GAfH8JwAzfxds56hjGZ0IJAhB Xfzk4RZsw+HyTWilDbSHBcaWW4BHG5ME677PRo900eSfLzfOMZN2A/+3s1q4ZFUSx7hR WZZUHaZCY2WMGYfwIKS3ujBt+CFEPadRXI7fwvhSOEZ5D4NdTtU/AYIJ5Ni2gmXBKtHj pTiQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20230601; t=1700981979; x=1701586779; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=XzZbSoB0MgnfUOQGvWmnOTw+WEdcAXrLdBCYYGb0Pao=; b=keVGGDQCOEagyE8H+x5nimebr8VhNa02rzI1AWzyCQNbKxDDGSK2Qae7ZftQ+lOtCF OLaug0yspJY+KKHYnSRD/YEfuSXE8CVAHY/gZ8fY3110sScYKwXpLgpMI4p5jJRgWEVf SUZ3GLXooAxLZAccHPu3thh5K+b3tX/OVont67pCYibZGBd2YrDtexYFhf6zZZHtlod9 j/t4dq0m/Ot6gK+9W5G8DfZ8aW8ud8+/+YTrqLpBz4pTp8tLo9CN47lBv7lKGgL3QFDu uW9kRg0ahrN1qjI9NqITi4epV/NSI+FK0NGlWN/QU9d4lVr8hnomcVOXLEY+4CVchtGw zXMg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzoEKrpKT4mgi1eXsLRzKuByS2BfbL3JiXfz57LNxQeUKd7ZTKt ECu79fo5RxXwF1ChnSkXDkV5DTwGNfJ6O0lIbcU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH6zzN+8S4Z3QIagIsiZq6ydM0BBbsueDxCM3fV5cNgG/HcvFsdwBv1Gh8Amt5lbO91xD/yLPzxiZUGNjhI9a0=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:beab:0:b0:2c9:92e7:8fb1 with SMTP id a43-20020a2ebeab000000b002c992e78fb1mr3622114ljr.1.1700981979079; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 22:59:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 08:59:43 +0200
Message-ID: <>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <>
Cc: Charlie Perkins <>, "" <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a1e9d4060b08ba80"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [manet] AODVv2 implementation
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 06:59:45 -0000

On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 4:32 PM Juliusz Chroboczek <> wrote:

> Hi Charlie,
> > I do not have an implementation.
> It is my understanding that Henning has concerns about the implementability
> of AODVv2.  Given Henning's track record, I recommend that we should not
> dismiss his concerns.

I agree that we review/comment_on draft as author request within ietf-wg. I
don't remember that there was review from him regarding one
wg-aodvv2-draft, however, it is more better that comments are related to WG
drafts or individual drafts, because discussing generally is not understood
by me.

> > I feel confident that an efficient implementation is very doable.
> At first sight, this appears to contradict what Henning told me.  Since
> both of you are world-class specialists, there's obviously something that
> I don't understand.
> Could you please explain what it is exactly that I'm missing?

IMHO, we need to explain things within wg-list pointing to implementations,
documents or presentations submitted to the meetings or discuss-lists. If
some one have done an implementation for AODV with errors then they MUST
report to this WG, but so far there is no error reported so far. So we
cannot explain what some participant did not implement but he/she is
commenting_to_authors of something is missing without pointing to

Best Wishes

> manet mailing list