Re: [mile] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rolie-10

"Waltermire, David A. (Fed)" <david.waltermire@nist.gov> Mon, 23 October 2017 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E65138351; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nistgov.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iNDdAH_J2K5T; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gcc01-dm2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm2gcc01on0121.outbound.protection.outlook.com [23.103.201.121]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9D5C139A22; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nistgov.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nist-gov; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=BJnqfeISv80GkcgTcdp8LDDf3owlYHIVJa7LJeq2GWE=; b=eHb/PZnibsHcyUIyVbM2LdtA6sn97tRl8h4W+niiauneWIrOgkU/pAdTky/IQeyisbvJLoPNo413FTMtJs8Ip54/LBJPpIJiF5srlX5MwPW7wquZj6Yrn0opuQOxJdzkKLHDU30wybo/5DuUC+oczyNknzhIzN+rgkBxUcjZ1ug=
Received: from CY4PR09MB1495.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.173.191.141) by CY4PR09MB1493.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.173.191.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.77.7; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:33:43 +0000
Received: from CY4PR09MB1495.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.191.141]) by CY4PR09MB1495.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.191.141]) with mapi id 15.20.0156.006; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:33:43 +0000
From: "Waltermire, David A. (Fed)" <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
To: "art-ads@ietf.org" <art-ads@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mile-rolie.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mile-rolie.all@ietf.org>, "mile@ietf.org" <mile@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mile] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rolie-10
Thread-Index: AQHTQLy6AlrnYGEzJkSW/mjw8rDt26Lra++AgAB9mgCABewtsA==
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:33:43 +0000
Message-ID: <CY4PR09MB14957651F17655DA89024EBDF0460@CY4PR09MB1495.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <150752570618.18384.5615358468704377459@ietfa.amsl.com> <DM5PR09MB13070FC0B54EB6DB8C707EE7F0420@DM5PR09MB1307.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <CABkgnnX5NVZgYtOWYMgD5yEOmdnk2GEZuyR2OLNDwbTO-BytAw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnX5NVZgYtOWYMgD5yEOmdnk2GEZuyR2OLNDwbTO-BytAw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=david.waltermire@nist.gov;
x-originating-ip: [129.6.224.58]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY4PR09MB1493; 6:Vta+2Tage0dB4BDo01oI7YhyngnRFVRCleveRr3m2pPf+kmOASbRa7G0uw5YnthrwM7k8zZ/TnmTHGzY/wnlI8AohRRAHowfZA2sQTbog9Vw4BbPta6nHDDCEP9NVGTrUS0xFhDXncFzQIGT9Tk5ZgKUlIVER+OqCkHaWx3Y+vLqg66vc6E4siN5sZcPzXA4v5MTZgghTjnczf8YtOTdr7xnm/m4MZteS1M/2jQi90J7dhnXjVwB/JXhrE9yEStIo2LoK7H8Uln7uxIXHCR9C1jlucoc/xtIBRf0Ney64IyoxLUHhVLCURWBdeg87g52RrS080UG2kxRbN5xGsHDJQ==; 5:bp+qHlQHIWWE5pTnpsNDyCpSRYoRjtSraNp2iGcAWOnH9An/KHKazLyjZnkqCa75u98RBf9OSSeswqyAMDYNH34jfcsa4I6CMk2PiQ/UHYgLKLn+onp+DdIIKPmFKPN76SiO3jqsTDuBCmPBQCc57A==; 24:rABFbqDn0WSNxyaUS7LKtm8GnrgHw8Co12qY5wr3CPCuaE/Dpl0TsqjrP+WXYoskWSAdEQowXn55bFDgdEqg9qhx91qpC61BHLUufw9PA5U=; 7:WTiahKy5DXjrDRKsATk9Y7qIjBJ+TZU39j5AJ4JWM0KNVgRi9QxjZYG1xFXmxNTlO1CAWOKGUGzrGdG6To3HGMhsaRUvWDq+e59yI0pwu8YSaQ8fkoa2DZo/KxyFBNVcotVYSsQ1zcJrM60324SgG0Fguj5Tc7A9+3AIZWvwkizTwTJv/z9tZGZCQryDKaGdLf2tX9aMd3uf7RqCCF1MnHbHt8KbMDev3GRZIElC+Ss=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: cf38db75-b25b-4ef5-7216-08d51a4496fc
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(48565401081)(4534020)(4602075)(4627075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(2017052603199); SRVR:CY4PR09MB1493;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CY4PR09MB1493:
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY4PR09MB1493415EACFB1D1552AED2DCF0460@CY4PR09MB1493.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(6040450)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(3231020)(10201501046)(100000703101)(100105400095)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123558100)(20161123560025)(20161123564025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(6072148)(201708071742011)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:CY4PR09MB1493; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:CY4PR09MB1493;
x-forefront-prvs: 046985391D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(346002)(376002)(39860400002)(189002)(199003)(76104003)(2201001)(14454004)(8936002)(110136005)(2950100002)(2501003)(68736007)(25786009)(3660700001)(3280700002)(81156014)(86362001)(66066001)(316002)(3846002)(450100002)(102836003)(6116002)(2906002)(81166006)(478600001)(8676002)(74316002)(305945005)(105586002)(5660300001)(7736002)(229853002)(9686003)(6436002)(33656002)(76176999)(50986999)(101416001)(77096006)(106356001)(230783001)(189998001)(2900100001)(53936002)(6506006)(97736004)(54356999)(7696004)(6246003)(99286003)(55016002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY4PR09MB1493; H:CY4PR09MB1495.namprd09.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nist.gov does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nist.gov
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Oct 2017 18:33:43.4299 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2ab5d82f-d8fa-4797-a93e-054655c61dec
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY4PR09MB1493
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/FgEPnGgZVId6643-xOOqLgg8GWw>
Subject: Re: [mile] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rolie-10
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:33:47 -0000

Ben, Alexey, and Adam,

Working through Martin's ARTART review of ROLIE, we had the following exchange with Martin.

> >> From martin:
> >> Question: it's fairly widely accepted that use of IRIs in Atom has
> >> been less than successful.  Do you want to mandate use of URIs
> >> instead?  This would apply to both link relations and the "src" attribute.
> >
> > From Stephen:
> > We wanted to stay in line with the requirements in Atom, if this becomes
> an issue it may be worth re-examining.
> 
> From Martin:
> This is your chance.  You don't get to go back or re-examine once your
> protocol is widely deployed.

I understand Martin's point above. It is basically that URIs are more narrowly scoped and interoperable than IRIs are. From my experience I have seen that URIs are broadly used, and IRIs have not seen much use. Given this feedback, it looks like the best thing to do might be to break with ATOM and use the more restrictive URI in ROLIE to ensure the best possible interoperability within resulting solutions.

What do you think about such a change? Any advice?

Thanks,
Dave