RE: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG adoption ofinternetdrafts
"Soliman, Hesham" <hsoliman@qualcomm.com> Tue, 28 March 2006 17:22 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FOHtn-00028M-1r; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:22:31 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FO0JZ-0003e5-6R for mipshop@ietf.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:35:57 -0500
Received: from numenor.qualcomm.com ([129.46.51.58]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FO0JX-0008W3-Gi for mipshop@ietf.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:35:57 -0500
Received: from neophyte.qualcomm.com (neophyte.qualcomm.com [129.46.61.149]) by numenor.qualcomm.com (8.13.6/8.12.5/1.0) with ESMTP id k2RMZoja032220 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:35:50 -0800
Received: from NAEXBR02.na.qualcomm.com (naexbr02.qualcomm.com [10.46.92.109]) by neophyte.qualcomm.com (8.13.5/8.12.5/1.0) with ESMTP id k2RMYg3N018644; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:35:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAEX06.na.qualcomm.com ([129.46.135.161]) by NAEXBR02.na.qualcomm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:35:35 -0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG adoption ofinternetdrafts
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:32:25 -0800
Message-ID: <1487A357FD2ED544B8AD29E528FF9DF029FA03@NAEX06.na.qualcomm.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG adoption ofinternetdrafts
Thread-Index: AcZR6dxSh9jpuwIoS4uP760ekIeIJQABHXvL
References: <20060322074936.65932.qmail@web81910.mail.mud.yahoo.com><Pine.LNX.4.58.0603272256480.3081@rhea.tcs.hut.fi> <016c01c651e0$e65d82d0$026115ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com>
From: "Soliman, Hesham" <hsoliman@qualcomm.com>
To: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>, Wassim Haddad <whaddad@tcs.hut.fi>, gabriel montenegro <gabriel_montenegro_2000@yahoo.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Mar 2006 22:35:35.0805 (UTC) FILETIME=[C3F0EAD0:01C651EE]
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 3b3709b7fb3320c78bd7b1555081f0fc
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:22:30 -0500
Cc: mipshop@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mipshop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: mipshop.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop>, <mailto:mipshop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mipshop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mipshop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop>, <mailto:mipshop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0970863380=="
Errors-To: mipshop-bounces@ietf.org
As we've discussed offlist, context transfer of keys between ARs has the potential to violate the Housley Critera: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt-02.txt Russ' draft is written specifically with AAA key management in mind, but the criteria apply to other types of key management as well. => Independently of the draft being discussed, I think it's unrealistic to say that no keys can be transferred. The only alternatives are: a trip to AAA or the use of public keys for each handover. I really don't think either one is better for a handover. However, I'd be open to including them as alternatives. But I certainly wouldn't dismiss CT of keys, I think it's unrealistic. Also, this is what most cellular systems do today, starting from GSM onwards. Hesham I skimmed your draft, and it seemed to me that there might be a problem. Rajeev and I have been working on this draft for over a year, and it was transferred from MOBOPTS with the recommendation that it become a WG draft. If you manage to come up with some way to reduce the amount of signaling involved in SEND-based key exchange for handover that is consistent with the Housley Critera, I would have no problem incorporating that into the WG draft at that time. Gab and Stefano can correct me if I am wrong, but I do not believe we are in a hurry to get this draft to the IESG, so there should be plenty of time to incorporate enhancements that you or any WG member would like to include. jak ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wassim Haddad" <whaddad@tcs.hut.fi> To: "gabriel montenegro" <gabriel_montenegro_2000@yahoo.com> Cc: <mipshop@ietf.org> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 12:07 PM Subject: Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG adoption of internetdrafts > Hi, > > I support making the first two and the last three items WG items. > Concerning the third item, I'd like to mention that the OptiSEND > proposal (draft-haddad-mipshop-optisend-01), while not complete yet, > allows the MN to share a secret with the *first* AR and to use it to > authenticate ND signaling messages *and* mobility signaling messages > exchanged between an AR and the MN during the MN movements and as > long as the shared secret remains valid. > > > Regards, > > Wassim H. > > > > On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, gabriel montenegro wrote: > >> Folks, >> >> In today's meeting we talked about 4 potential items up for adoption as >> official working >> groups. Talking with folks after the meeting, we've decided to add two >> more to the list >> of items we'll ask the WG whether we should adopt. This is the follow-up >> email to today's >> discussion, to make sure we ask this on the mailing list. >> >> So the question to the WG is: Should we adopt the following documents as >> official WG >> items (based on the individual drafts as noted below)?: >> >> 1. draft-ietf-mipshop-fmipv6-rev-XX.txt >> based on draft-koodli-mipshop-rfc4068bis-00.txt >> >> 2. draft-ietf-mipshop-handover-keys-aaa-XX.txt >> based on draft-vidya-mipshop-handover-keys-aaa-01.txt >> >> 3. draft-ietf-mipshop-handover-key-send-XX.txt >> based on draft-kempf-mobopts-handover-key-01.txt (currently expired) >> >> 4. draft-ietf-mipshop-fh80216e-XX.txt >> based on draft-jang-mipshop-fh80216e-02.txt >> >> 5. draft-ietf-mipshop-3gfh-XX.txt >> based on draft-yokota-mipshop-3gfh-02.txt >> >> 6. draft-ietf-mipshop-cga-cba-XX.txt >> based on draft-arkko-mipshop-cga-cba-03.txt >> >> Please send comments one way or another through April 4, 2006. >> >> Thanks, >> >> chairs >> >> >> __________________________________________________ >> Do You Yahoo!? >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >> http://mail.yahoo.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mipshop mailing list >> Mipshop@ietf.org >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Mipshop mailing list > Mipshop@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop > _______________________________________________ Mipshop mailing list Mipshop@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop
_______________________________________________ Mipshop mailing list Mipshop@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop
- [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG adoptio… gabriel montenegro
- Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… James Kempf
- Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… Soohong Daniel Park
- Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… Yoshihiro Ohba
- RE: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… Soliman, Hesham
- Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… Wassim Haddad
- Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… James Kempf
- Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… James Kempf
- Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… Rajeev Koodli
- RE: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… Wassim Haddad
- RE: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… Soliman, Hesham
- Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… James Kempf
- Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… James Kempf
- Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… Wassim Haddad
- Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… Yoshihiro Ohba
- RE: [Mipshop] Re: Gauging interest in official WG… stefano.faccin
- OptiSEND and FMIP SEND-based Key Provisioning (wa… James Kempf
- Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… Junghoon Jee
- Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG ado… Behcet Sarikaya
- [Mipshop] Re: Gauging interest in official WG ado… gabriel montenegro
- Re: [Mipshop] Re: Gauging interest in official WG… Lakshminath Dondeti
- RE: [Mipshop] Re: Gauging interest in official WG… stefano.faccin
- Re: [Mipshop] Re: Gauging interest in official WG… James Kempf
- RE: [Mipshop] Re: Gauging interest in official WG… Lakshminath Dondeti
- RE: [Mipshop] Re: Gauging interest in official WG… Lakshminath Dondeti
- RE: [Mipshop] Re: Gauging interest in official WG… gabriel montenegro
- Re: [Mipshop] Re: Gauging interest in official WG… James Kempf