Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG adoption of internet drafts

Wassim Haddad <whaddad@tcs.hut.fi> Mon, 27 March 2006 20:07 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FNxzZ-0002zx-Ab; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:07:09 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FNxzY-0002vi-CX for mipshop@ietf.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:07:08 -0500
Received: from neon.tcs.hut.fi ([130.233.215.20]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FNxzY-0006xe-24 for mipshop@ietf.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:07:08 -0500
Received: from rhea.tcs.hut.fi (rhea.tcs.hut.fi [130.233.215.147]) by neon.tcs.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE915800088; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:07:06 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:07:06 +0300
From: Wassim Haddad <whaddad@tcs.hut.fi>
To: gabriel montenegro <gabriel_montenegro_2000@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG adoption of internet drafts
In-Reply-To: <20060322074936.65932.qmail@web81910.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0603272256480.3081@rhea.tcs.hut.fi>
References: <20060322074936.65932.qmail@web81910.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 52f7a77164458f8c7b36b66787c853da
Cc: mipshop@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mipshop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: mipshop.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop>, <mailto:mipshop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mipshop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mipshop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop>, <mailto:mipshop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: mipshop-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

I support making the first two and the last three items WG items.
Concerning the third item, I'd like to mention that the OptiSEND
proposal (draft-haddad-mipshop-optisend-01), while not complete yet,
allows the MN to share a secret with the *first* AR and to use it to
authenticate ND signaling messages *and* mobility signaling messages
exchanged between an AR and the MN during the MN movements and as
long as the shared secret remains valid.


Regards,

Wassim H.



On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, gabriel montenegro wrote:

> Folks,
>
> In today's meeting we talked about 4 potential items up for adoption as official working
> groups. Talking with folks after the meeting, we've decided to add two more to the list
> of items we'll ask the WG whether we should adopt. This is the follow-up email to today's
> discussion, to make sure we ask this on the mailing list.
>
> So the question to the WG is: Should we adopt the following documents as official WG
> items (based on the individual drafts as noted below)?:
>
> 1. draft-ietf-mipshop-fmipv6-rev-XX.txt
> based on draft-koodli-mipshop-rfc4068bis-00.txt
>
> 2. draft-ietf-mipshop-handover-keys-aaa-XX.txt
> based on  draft-vidya-mipshop-handover-keys-aaa-01.txt
>
> 3. draft-ietf-mipshop-handover-key-send-XX.txt
> based on draft-kempf-mobopts-handover-key-01.txt (currently expired)
>
> 4. draft-ietf-mipshop-fh80216e-XX.txt
> based on draft-jang-mipshop-fh80216e-02.txt
>
> 5. draft-ietf-mipshop-3gfh-XX.txt
> based on draft-yokota-mipshop-3gfh-02.txt
>
> 6. draft-ietf-mipshop-cga-cba-XX.txt
> based on draft-arkko-mipshop-cga-cba-03.txt
>
> Please send comments one way or another through April 4, 2006.
>
> Thanks,
>
> chairs
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mipshop mailing list
> Mipshop@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop
>
>

_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshop@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop