Re: [Mipshop] Gauging interest in official WG adoption of internet drafts

[Lakshminath Dondeti <[e-mail]>]

Disclaimer: I work with one of the authors (Vidya) of the 
handover-keys-aaa I-D, although didn't contribute to the draft in anyway.

I just read the parts of the I-D that seem to be contentious and note 
that the reference to AMSKs is merely an example and the HMK can be 
established through other means, say by preprovisioning.

That said, I think it is best to remove Appendix A (I am not sure 
about A.1, that probably should stay and resolved later) as it 
reproduces a key hierarchy and key derivation process that is still 
under active discussion.

regards,
Lakshminath

At 04:25 PM 3/25/2006, Yoshihiro Ohba wrote:
>I have a reservation on draft-vidya-mipshop-handover-keys-aaa-01.txt.
>
>The draft describes a AAA-assisted key management protocol to generate
>handover keys for protecting signaling between MN and AR.  I am
>viewing the proposal as an application keying for FMIPv6 and possibly
>other protocols.  However, in the IETF65 hoakey BOF, Sam Hartman, a
>Security AD, raised concern on application keying.  As a consequence,
>the hoakey BOF chairs made a decision to exclude application keying
>from the BOF charter, expecting application keying to be discussed in
>a separate BOF.
>
>Thus, it might be wiser to hold this draft until there is a clear
>consensus on how to deal with application keying in the IETF.
>
>Best regards,
>Yoshihiro Ohba
>
>
>On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 11:49:36PM -0800, gabriel montenegro wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > In today's meeting we talked about 4 potential items up for 
> adoption as official working
> > groups. Talking with folks after the meeting, we've decided to 
> add two more to the list
> > of items we'll ask the WG whether we should adopt. This is the 
> follow-up email to today's
> > discussion, to make sure we ask this on the mailing list.
> >
> > So the question to the WG is: Should we adopt the following 
> documents as official WG
> > items (based on the individual drafts as noted below)?:
> >
> > 1. draft-ietf-mipshop-fmipv6-rev-XX.txt
> > based on draft-koodli-mipshop-rfc4068bis-00.txt
> >
> > 2. draft-ietf-mipshop-handover-keys-aaa-XX.txt
> > based on  draft-vidya-mipshop-handover-keys-aaa-01.txt
> >
> > 3. draft-ietf-mipshop-handover-key-send-XX.txt
> > based on draft-kempf-mobopts-handover-key-01.txt (currently expired)
> >
> > 4. draft-ietf-mipshop-fh80216e-XX.txt
> > based on draft-jang-mipshop-fh80216e-02.txt
> >
> > 5. draft-ietf-mipshop-3gfh-XX.txt
> > based on draft-yokota-mipshop-3gfh-02.txt
> >
> > 6. draft-ietf-mipshop-cga-cba-XX.txt
> > based on draft-arkko-mipshop-cga-cba-03.txt
> >
> > Please send comments one way or another through April 4, 2006.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > chairs
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mipshop mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop
> >
>
>_______________________________________________
>Mipshop mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop


_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop