[Mipshop] Re: Gauging interest in official WG adoption of internet drafts

Folks,

Thanks for the comments and participation in this discussion. In general,
there was good support for adoption of the proposed documents, but it seems
that for the security-related drafts, there were negative comments
and discussion than for the others. 

It was also suggested that a mobility directorate review would be a good
thing. This is actually a common practice predating this discussion: new
drafts being adopted by "mobility" working groups are requested for review
by mobdir. So we will request that review for all our adopted drafts.
However, we feel that given the comments on the security
drafts, we would like to have reviews for those drafts before actual adoption. 

In short, the drafts we're adopting right now are:

   draft-ietf-mipshop-fmipv6-rev-XX.txt 
   based on draft-koodli-mipshop-rfc4068bis-00.txt

   draft-ietf-mipshop-fh80216e-XX.txt 
   based on draft-jang-mipshop-fh80216e-02.txt

   draft-ietf-mipshop-3gfh-XX.txt 
   based on draft-yokota-mipshop-3gfh-02.txt

Next versions of the above drafts should adopt the official name shown above.

The drafts whose adoption is pending a mobility directorate review are:

   draft-ietf-mipshop-handover-keys-aaa-XX.txt 
   based on  draft-vidya-mipshop-handover-keys-aaa-01.txt

   draft-ietf-mipshop-handover-key-send-XX.txt 
   based on draft-kempf-mobopts-handover-key-01.txt (currently expired)

   draft-ietf-mipshop-cga-cba-XX.txt 
   based on draft-arkko-mipshop-cga-cba-03.txt

Again, we will request review of all the above by mobdir.

-chairs

--- gabriel montenegro <gabriel_montenegro_2000@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Folks,
> 
> In today's meeting we talked about 4 potential items up for adoption as official
> working
> groups. Talking with folks after the meeting, we've decided to add two more to the list
> of items we'll ask the WG whether we should adopt. This is the follow-up email to
> today's
> discussion, to make sure we ask this on the mailing list.
> 
> So the question to the WG is: Should we adopt the following documents as official WG
> items (based on the individual drafts as noted below)?:
> 
> 1. draft-ietf-mipshop-fmipv6-rev-XX.txt 
> based on draft-koodli-mipshop-rfc4068bis-00.txt
> 
> 2. draft-ietf-mipshop-handover-keys-aaa-XX.txt 
> based on  draft-vidya-mipshop-handover-keys-aaa-01.txt
> 
> 3. draft-ietf-mipshop-handover-key-send-XX.txt 
> based on draft-kempf-mobopts-handover-key-01.txt (currently expired)
> 
> 4. draft-ietf-mipshop-fh80216e-XX.txt 
> based on draft-jang-mipshop-fh80216e-02.txt
> 
> 5. draft-ietf-mipshop-3gfh-XX.txt 
> based on draft-yokota-mipshop-3gfh-02.txt
> 
> 6. draft-ietf-mipshop-cga-cba-XX.txt 
> based on draft-arkko-mipshop-cga-cba-03.txt
> 
> Please send comments one way or another through April 4, 2006.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> chairs
> 
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshop@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop