[MMUSIC] When a bundle offer is forked

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Thu, 23 May 2013 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B21921F8B16 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 10:46:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.286
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.286 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.151, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r2Pb5-RyZiiR for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 10:46:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:44:76:96:59:243]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6BB921F8FDC for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 10:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.19]) by qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id fPz81l0060QuhwU5DVa5AL; Thu, 23 May 2013 17:34:05 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.164]) by omta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id fVa51l00a3ZTu2S3NVa5UR; Thu, 23 May 2013 17:34:05 +0000
Message-ID: <519E530C.60705@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 13:34:04 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C374357@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <519A1336.9010001@jitsi.org> <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1159D127@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net> <519A229D.7090204@jitsi.org> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C374463@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <519A2768.5010904@alum.mit.edu> <CAPvvaa+A=LkYp9A+wENAABwCYaQcD0HVeX4o+O_16iJRPXZfNw@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3744DC@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAPvvaaJsPNk1DAJXYoc8aUgZ0ZayV_8q84W=Mm7vwuRRGuwC-g@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C374572@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <519A3883.8060006@jitsi.org> <519A3C8F.3040309@alum.mit.edu> <519B343A.30704@jitsi.org> <519BB598.1030909@alum.mit.edu> <519DF0F8.1070407@jitsi.org>
In-Reply-To: <519DF0F8.1070407@jitsi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1369330445; bh=A7+EJFTfcJ+Qo3rU1AjEVhyx1eL/URu6syuu1Yf82mM=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=DszQTvoiduoL1VP9tZGj4tYfuzsy4fbRhFPIxLrIgQH+xuFiAfXuvqnMF+dGRlmrP FS1sN0D7AKGWhVHKVdfRi8e2yL7VAG7iUSQeOTsaKDpYqfCndAtZmsIZcDWg3XvpbM gAd4YVKnpQVlfZYczvE0BTOO9fu1mN3BHXia23aDrHLKZ8J6Meej7s8r/+jE4VWQ6A 7uw9cJz5ZR3r2vc4MEXTMY0KIGdrbxRIoG/zoajOkb/jy4+qmNC1hXXFYk4+9OIQll w/9TVxDRYrYMkM00a1dsretqz3+G9xQQS677/pLAzwCTssHYak0lrbTmWav1NNsh8Y 23rDMXnQSIKdg==
Cc: mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Subject: [MMUSIC] When a bundle offer is forked
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 17:46:47 -0000

On 5/23/13 6:35 AM, Emil Ivov wrote:

> In case a bundle offer gets forked and various answers ...

I trimmed everything else out of Emil's reply, and changed to subject, 
because this is a whole different can of worms!

I think we must acknowledge that this *can* happen, though it is a low 
probability event. It raises all sorts of ugly issues. A few:

* if the bundle is accepted by multiple forks, does this form
   one RTP session or several? If so,

   - if so, then if each fork accepts a different set of m-lines from
     the bundle, how can that work with a single RTP session?

* How does ICE work in this case? (Is that already covered by ICE,
   since it mostly isn't specific to bundle?

* If one fork adds/removes an m-line from the bundle, should that
   be mirrored to the other forks?

* ...

ISTM that the simplest thing we could do about this is put a statement 
in the draft that this draft does not specify behavior in the case of 
forking - that conforming devices are constrained to a single fork, and 
that behavior in forking cases could be a subject of future standardization.

	Thanks,
	Paul