IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls-tp] Comments on draft-fbb-mpls-tp-data-plane-00: ~ECMP => ~ETH aggregation?

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Wed, 10 March 2010 14:44 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8393A6800 for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:44:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.192
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.192 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.407, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PMRe8IR8JDKG for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:44:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764083A67F6 for <mpls-tp@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:44:51 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: ams-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArQAAHY/l0uQ/uCWe2dsb2JhbACbBxUBAQsLJAYcpD+BPQoBlwmEeQQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,614,1262563200"; d="scan'208";a="57890459"
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.150]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2010 14:44:55 +0000
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.71.48]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2AEitN9022806; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:44:55 GMT
Received: from dhcp-bdlk09-vlan301-data-64-103-105-59.cisco.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cisco.com (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id o2AEisX06172; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:44:54 GMT
Message-ID: <4B97B066.8050006@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:44:54 +0000
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: benjamin.niven-jenkins@bt.com
References: <C7B5FD69.FDCD%benjamin.niven-jenkins@bt.com>
In-Reply-To: <C7B5FD69.FDCD%benjamin.niven-jenkins@bt.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: RCosta@ptinovacao.pt, mpls-tp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] Comments on draft-fbb-mpls-tp-data-plane-00: ~ECMP => ~ETH aggregation?
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:44:52 -0000

benjamin.niven-jenkins@bt.com wrote:
> .... but just note that
> server layer paths may in reality be composed of multiple links presented to
> MPLS-TP as a single server layer path and that special care is required when
> designing for such scenarios.
>
> Ben
>   
We will add text to this effect.

Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email