IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label

Sri <sriganeshkini@gmail.com> Fri, 29 April 2016 21:39 UTC

Return-Path: <sriganeshkini@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1D112D743; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k_cJnX5dww7q; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22f.google.com (mail-oi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AA0D12B04A; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id x201so133429810oif.3; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=k2mJJViSnKTpjiF2vFlxX3sU0vo2NmlOtW0KUaPDeY8=; b=WKuCBRJtOMcwsWVA6e4zPas0WxzBk0OH3+sb80MQDnqG1r4Ngg+T8/wZFYNAgZVzwZ wK+MMaDnSVQ9U8gs4R8S1KZn7rAyemyFQ9CLVqQiV99Bd+jqqEQNhgVwAzv1DD0t/1Vx 4J1610G5rCn5gkZH238/A/VGhI/iAsgBXUT1wi589R8viIOFOjai7gVu9PFBuIAiV8bA 6VLIgBsQS33eTHlO1gh5gsowZZiFYZ8eI23CqKmnCx1i05uTpW2cqIGAi9kdC73Mileu SbztjsCY1iZolyU6wVb3WTE0SrzepWjpio+tyF8tydt+lhosoGnh1/P25FSkCVQ82Ttc ZeRA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=k2mJJViSnKTpjiF2vFlxX3sU0vo2NmlOtW0KUaPDeY8=; b=PG4DiZzQWwQ+g1QD5BR+lGZ7jfFWVuaBJS1rVuxHar9eB+CQ3CE4zNuHgxdcIcysNo RJd1sEC9caQ60i4ZgCBLlGL9BSjUoxkc5WA29sPKKGlN2EvSSfUmomdwDpdI3G9YBff5 i6SwPQKtmW8CwHnBflgxw6WQSChF2TrJ1IuECGdcZRyCgmk+6Plp8IGa44pvujHIZwax c28ffSvTLmzz7XwFm/VMm/5VaeZV+QyNP77vNnpV/v8tMVp0oNfaqpdJjUMPTBC0i7VY ETongoVk9Btm90xsjtH6O72wP6WOVu5ORHfnYQIUrGwWpoyLfyMvqyyIH5kQYUGfxd1R XZOQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWluqxxOa+33OFJipeT6ZhUv62bEAMgHUFxjJvIa62oKsay5Y6Y2FAWAb+/+PlDX3BrnXZ5DTLPlSR/OA==
X-Received: by 10.202.2.79 with SMTP id 76mr10694981oic.108.1461965955755; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.223.213 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <DF2AE2A6-4141-4481-9C05-D91A349CA3EE@gmail.com>
References: <571B29F8.1060301@pi.nu> <571E229B.2090405@gmail.com> <CAAA2pyd55Unb55tgzZ1G1C1RRDXkGYgWSf8qctfnM6=qUBkp6g@mail.gmail.com> <571E69F2.8020506@gmail.com> <CAOndX-s3hu3wGoN5eFWfjjmXTExn60L_5+rErzHLMaCgLTuozw@mail.gmail.com> <DF2AE2A6-4141-4481-9C05-D91A349CA3EE@gmail.com>
From: Sri <sriganeshkini@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:38:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOndX-svpdZkBLLZFpdnc355bdLkS8+aOKD7C_rnn-jz5io19A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1137bac87779f30531a67947"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/FyL78vBUJ1iqzu-3TeHZJSUVP2E>
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@tools.ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 21:39:18 -0000

Hi Stewart,

Since this will be an Informational draft shouldn't it be okay?

Sri

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On 29 Apr 2016, at 21:41, Sri <sriganeshkini@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sri> Just re-iterating a response to a similar point in an earlier email -
>  "Since there are different ways to do this and some ways are better than
> others, this draft lists the different options and recommends one solution."
>
>
> Hi Sri
>
> We don't normally make a formal recommendation on a local matter such as
> this.
>
> Stewart
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email