IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Sat, 07 May 2016 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC0512D0CE; Sat, 7 May 2016 13:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KHSsCxcI5gjh; Sat, 7 May 2016 13:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com (mail-wm0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39DCB12B04C; Sat, 7 May 2016 13:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id g17so126954535wme.1; Sat, 07 May 2016 13:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f9QYSt2APV6gxCuA3VehtD1NtXnwrJYlwWw1Yb7ZN+0=; b=gQ/Fnpiqp1gRB28y48lSOPWS5Ek5bCGfwH9c2ukCtQ7M0T2yU/fNceBe4wKbhxc6wh YFryC1haTQrq70wg7Ck4jrYKCG5Z61G1040+Jz4tO976zcHJEWMT7/5lYGikXh0daCiN G3FLTBU++ISjXQfkAqCUARpUwiAlf5TnU+trEixhDSbrYIw6GC6RhWCeKpOtHyb2xS8u vGVqLvRs24/UXsBWSVifZmnj+o+kfnnMz2dxnFd7xOFCeGZpOR67bOPNi3u5gae3WpxW NwgdtmS1ZH4QHDsdpZUj/MdmC7xMKs6AGBQFO2mYIPVhNjIi6PhF2I1aJZPOsX3c1gX/ MTgQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f9QYSt2APV6gxCuA3VehtD1NtXnwrJYlwWw1Yb7ZN+0=; b=Rz3DVGS7AxvtACuqhlqWWqTIy1sClW24Je0gin3LQNHZzWal706WbTXFx6FyN6FXHG 18SItPMLwtACwg+X2zmQnWKHV/m7FEDq18jZdpJgw8Q5BBRNZdjfwtX/pxhHEd+liFhx S/FisYAQApchCaCPGUS4ENcbbkO/lx3OzOZi4qUSxQq1hkUD4uDJ7Dqk95oPR3S3o7ow M+T8xh+JcmksKIVtlT+d1prTFxTwzK6u61LupKvunKtP1AU45MLptMpeoi42AGGA9wmq GmUiDnbht3+7hS/PH75bG0FnX42q37HPvDYxZJA+Bwss887vjyfWrRcc2u4Nl9b07M+Q hT9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXe+hMaEoN4O2vFk+S5nr4lhyGmn2dQ0dZL8tAup3Msq3uXyiuzvA0prYzaOd17KA==
X-Received: by 10.194.62.145 with SMTP id y17mr28096316wjr.109.1462654068833; Sat, 07 May 2016 13:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.134] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h4sm1362414wjz.20.2016.05.07.13.47.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 07 May 2016 13:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, "stephane.litkowski@orange.com" <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>
References: <571B29F8.1060301@pi.nu> <6755_1462365901_5729EECD_6755_4861_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A0F8956EC@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <26762_1462367973_5729F6E5_26762_562_2_de66e165-d751-4eb7-9b10-ff9d96812ad4@OPEXCLILMA1.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <8C085335-EF95-4A0D-A003-D8CD807DD3F3@cisco.com>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <572E5476.20901@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 21:47:50 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8C085335-EF95-4A0D-A003-D8CD807DD3F3@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/u9qysGq6d3pQEJDrvH493BaPudY>
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@tools.ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 20:47:51 -0000


On 07/05/2016 17:58, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) wrote:
> Are there FRR considerations for the calculation, since a node repair 
> can add labels, etc?

Both a link repair and a node repair can add labels.

I would have thought that the ingress node would assume no repair (the 
normal case) and the repairing node would have worried about RLD - 
assuming it worried about ECMPing the repair at all.

- Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email