IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Poll 1: ISD and PSD in the MNA Framework

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 31 May 2022 14:33 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769ADC15C019; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4w6PXZeF2tXY; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com (mail-lf1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2A84C15AE21; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id u23so21807676lfc.1; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gwEU1mwxwwH9mqRAiZjtzjzEPufrtiTc7tXlRbz8oYo=; b=AA2Samz2o1xGJvCCbO5WB/yCsUTqwKAvknWgJ9zJalTi2S8+iCKVGsBRhX1m3wiau6 A4nBxr00Do/MfkV/KTOjElolPAIyPg+UoSKGYLwDewkusDbbKYaCZWuTBik0GTi4qk/O VG/V2qXJxOvwey61dwwdwY4gpcnqcMVS43125XeIRX4ur/pdYivQayvCZ+GhNUdjqurL 1YJaeyunjaXPL+ZnGCeOWfs32vyLrs/WZ8PtsbKMKOn5QpnvqeFYz2l//J9KYsoZEW9V R0tFEbEbGf7l2gkKFfEVammBgApQevXJthLAOrImoMxnLmcyJDLaCjaPYKURcwSVAmZA WzxQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gwEU1mwxwwH9mqRAiZjtzjzEPufrtiTc7tXlRbz8oYo=; b=je2kbKKZhrywlqX4aohmQXlLacTyhBQR3o+5PIYGZR/6lz07WRvq1poLmHLDtlyyNA 0Y3nR7ZBf7r7Yw7j3fVD7zGiA71bHyzGtgIUsj8tpB8L/hB5KRxmMV18BJbFMRERJH79 mIQc3mc601EtIr9zHYrWxpA1XJ5nOWL7zbcHAO4H277b8dT1sD+KNl5vxPK/M3vOHZEc 6pAU0OFAxHigp1hQhH4sb0RPWbmRIDDhkeL6F+27yRV3eLua0ti6MAIpp3bEkif4BmtG 2N4Ci8eRjoQjiq9Qu/5Ap/+OcGdG8H0sHJJQtLHs4cBe1RS5n2vEMsqFX7K0lC3KQEuE s/qw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530pDdipgvTf4YFW40Nn5ov5/lI4wefxAQS6LJWbuvzWiUmsuH14 Ji+1XHqDTm4gQXZl+YTmaMxmRh4gd1A1E2jc0ogqp2CD
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQ+EpjZr5DkiQsITegmEL1nfQ9Ff8IqwcYyaeD0t+IYm63xQff/L2WfdkJIxMf5TiH4yqUUpSRqdnhU0CCEm0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3184:b0:478:93cd:34c4 with SMTP id i4-20020a056512318400b0047893cd34c4mr25288065lfe.335.1654007577230; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <b660b14c-b9ee-16a6-b599-6d0789f363db@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <b660b14c-b9ee-16a6-b599-6d0789f363db@pi.nu>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 07:32:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVvHM8=h3_87j_5up-qGXwjxA1YuxFf_3nSi9V0UDs+_g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000018c24405e04fa683"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/L8pYtP8aJC_rwjGSTYDGkfm1wGU>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll 1: ISD and PSD in the MNA Framework
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 14:33:03 -0000

Dear Loa, MPLS WG Chairs, Open DT, et al.,
please find my answers to posted questions in-lined below tagged GIM>>.

Regards,
Greg

On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 2:20 PM Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:

> MPLS working group and and the Open MPLS DT,
>
> The working group chairs believe the current situation is:
>
> The Framework document must be solution independent and say:
>
GIM>> Agree

>
> a packet may carry Ancillary Data using one or both of the following
> methods:
>
>     (1) in-stack, and
>
>     (2) post-stack.
>
GIM>> Agree

>
> It is up to the document specifying the Network Action to specify which
> method is to be used for which Ancillary Data.
>
> Note, a Network Action may not require inclusion of Ancillary Data.
>
GIM>> I agree with the position stated above.

>
> Is this the consensus of the working group? Please respond to the MPLS
> WG mail list.
>
>
> Loa Andersson
> for the Open DT wg chairs
>
> --
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email