IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Poll 1: ISD and PSD in the MNA Framework

Luay Jalil <luayjalil.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 03 June 2022 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <luayjalil.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0AD7C14CF08; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 08:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ijo_Mb72yfus; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 08:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09867C14CF09; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 08:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id n185so4232943wmn.4; Fri, 03 Jun 2022 08:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qEeTqzOhoiRzauBSJm8rQ+fH+id8dXPjT1ibHTNOltM=; b=PRvlirFkhwThItVqTdPfnY9ZMK724z4OjY847+31e776oxgSuq81AQKwZQXSni3g20 HqvmFisvw7pZjE5Xi68PnkyCS+1Vvog9l09obgi4idGhelr20J+uQjzJW5u9BrsBr1Gr CM1EkHf23Bgzf/FoKmc1GCLPkDOc8413zj8naznBV56Gu5zEK8CqDHB3by1au6nRaXUI O5eItyF/FeTwwyUvDK/WAOtQRoPW+CdIcQxLae709aZFALnL8PKQevxC1/7RwNKVq5P4 lYFW5zHoFda3rCPoV/H8LSGmgMkiyj2XZlQWFNp5+GVXvpDgjGyQp4Fhblq9yd9yECFP RwaQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qEeTqzOhoiRzauBSJm8rQ+fH+id8dXPjT1ibHTNOltM=; b=UNCr+z7qzmQpHlWHjUexo0tJ8FHFt2gP2MUI+wO5QHFaox4joL/IjR2mm1OuGTmXH1 Gg/uZjoe9n0R+SqYBZUe8kkE1e7rUa6Rj7FEBpk15rdOo9JUZAdVs7RKYFyoa38XLbEv 0DMOC1+uC/qtk4beOrrYfKb1nGsckKoNfqNJ9IS1yJRQrJbWtaptlDF7Ij0qDO90PW6J MMVS3sni+JS1nETm05UoKzPExXEA2ignmIgs+211EEiMaff5/ok7KpzS3yOnxAGMWqp/ u4yUCGbzyaAzzkTzA7fOMsOKCUOK0GZ3/b6hTTJzgE5sRnGU6xQRWB2+foDEZw3h/My/ WG/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53376ZIkKrgY78OBfYKPKjSHzYZFiu9naUxy3rxgQF+eQdEzGjWO wsr+D4RtRjAaYqD/EAvJq+2zBHxWpFWfszVWWvJog3nq9VQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYTOxszq/nYQVNeF9iGrFL64a/UQ4KdS+/Sbe2ZpyeHImVamSnwde3BiMzKyoGKCHuLyPlUqJN8qhEzr4OwdE=
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cd0b:0:b0:397:49cf:2ef0 with SMTP id f11-20020a7bcd0b000000b0039749cf2ef0mr38666949wmj.156.1654268508857; Fri, 03 Jun 2022 08:01:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <b660b14c-b9ee-16a6-b599-6d0789f363db@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <b660b14c-b9ee-16a6-b599-6d0789f363db@pi.nu>
From: Luay Jalil <luayjalil.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2022 10:01:36 -0500
Message-ID: <CAM+_haXtSrwz07zSVD6X_+et=YvOpr1q+xsQroa0hhKL=1k01Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d5691705e08c6644"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/V8n1wCvNi2HkZFdhIdRO5zL1gK4>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll 1: ISD and PSD in the MNA Framework
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2022 15:01:54 -0000

Loa,
Agree with your statements

Regards,
Luay

On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 4:21 PM Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:

> MPLS working group and and the Open MPLS DT,
>
> The working group chairs believe the current situation is:
>
> The Framework document must be solution independent and say:
>
> a packet may carry Ancillary Data using one or both of the following
> methods:
>
>     (1) in-stack, and
>
>     (2) post-stack.
>
> It is up to the document specifying the Network Action to specify which
> method is to be used for which Ancillary Data.
>
> Note, a Network Action may not require inclusion of Ancillary Data.
>
> Is this the consensus of the working group? Please respond to the MPLS
> WG mail list.
>
>
> Loa Andersson
> for the Open DT wg chairs
>
> --
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email