Re: [mpls] Poll 1: ISD and PSD in the MNA Framework

[Joel Halpern <[e-mail]>]

I agree that the framework should (and does) describe both in-stack data 
and post-stack data.

Thank you,

Joel

On 5/30/2022 5:20 PM, Loa Andersson wrote:
> MPLS working group and and the Open MPLS DT,
>
> The working group chairs believe the current situation is:
>
> The Framework document must be solution independent and say:
>
> a packet may carry Ancillary Data using one or both of the following 
> methods:
>
>    (1) in-stack, and
>
>    (2) post-stack.
>
> It is up to the document specifying the Network Action to specify which
> method is to be used for which Ancillary Data.
>
> Note, a Network Action may not require inclusion of Ancillary Data.
>
> Is this the consensus of the working group? Please respond to the MPLS 
> WG mail list.
>
>
> Loa Andersson
> for the Open DT wg chairs
>