Re: [mpls] Poll 1: ISD and PSD in the MNA Framework

["Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <[e-mail]>]

+1.


Juniper Business Use Only

-----Original Message-----
From: mpls <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Kireeti Kompella
Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2022 1:42 PM
To: Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; DetNet Chairs <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll 1: ISD and PSD in the MNA Framework

[External Email. Be cautious of content]


Agree that the fwk doc must be soln independent, should talk about ISD and PSD and, yes, an NA may not have data (although it often will).

|:

> On May 30, 2022, at 14:20, Loa Andersson <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> MPLS working group and and the Open MPLS DT,
>
> The working group chairs believe the current situation is:
>
> The Framework document must be solution independent and say:
>
> a packet may carry Ancillary Data using one or both of the following methods:
>
>  (1) in-stack, and
>
>  (2) post-stack.
>
> It is up to the document specifying the Network Action to specify 
> which method is to be used for which Ancillary Data.
>
> Note, a Network Action may not require inclusion of Ancillary Data.
>
> Is this the consensus of the working group? Please respond to the MPLS WG mail list.
>
>
> Loa Andersson
> for the Open DT wg chairs
>
> --
> Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
> Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: [phone]
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> __;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!HyvWhWlzlB2-Pjxp4TkwWd-pwgE9lWfQDeXr3MtudN2skTs7yZl51
> WwTH7-KEjKVuYIjnEkUozU2qZVNz1YqXG0$

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
[e-mail]
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!HyvWhWlzlB2-Pjxp4TkwWd-pwgE9lWfQDeXr3MtudN2skTs7yZl51WwTH7-KEjKVuYIjnEkUozU2qZVNz1YqXG0$