Re: [mpls] Poll 1: ISD and PSD in the MNA Framework

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Tue, 31 May 2022 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92DAFC15BFF7; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.508
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.508 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kEfhZQn6vqZ9; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52c.google.com (mail-pg1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6115C14F741; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id s68so13003060pgs.10; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=0eX8+dTbGaZ74Fugmnm/9ruFzeKBzD1KtsOZuV0UczE=; b=YMlEa2UcfgMKNds1ANOJkWcqz6ahLvatQemux2zMoiS1lMys7l14z+dzXlZPzPMg8O bkNOcC35yl+PXj6LvkR+vp0csl2XwpDJdMYw97LqHYrV0UiqaoxIO+edGxBhPEnD/W51 /3uGwCgCLwjhQ3K7daDC0TTV8RPT+QNi3ISKSrWEHLYIPWaxwqv04XHweeMGi6JrpDsY d7FBn9YCez6rsyIwJdPZR1cWS9FkPw3/Dl/COuICrlvBxveQZfP1kMrhH4J5WRrlwCGu IDodSR8BhKcHjrJzGfkAK+1NE9uTZvEuarSxdM7jqA78tDuwFyZxg+EhSLYA0nZ2vJrw pglQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=0eX8+dTbGaZ74Fugmnm/9ruFzeKBzD1KtsOZuV0UczE=; b=B8f1s4E3JmAkpIyAp/aqw2RFG/+NV1BTn0VwtK/AbSAmFEkgMxB1QBz9+nF14xAdFT 0VhLg6lP1Hn4Bk9HUDIgtWQMQS5R8Vg7U6HNjtgr7Jw+WD1mxP2UAcuYsi5J7e2JCrfn K0cuIKv+t4VAHoYIIIO1KYmV+7S1Vtk/kODJ8TwaZQm+jBIe/pomMQN6Lk8h5UvXliOC l3dryy/iGMibBnGtc9bSAQ7PIETeZ5xIZlWzX/OkkEibE/ECpxQBG/htswLyKtGWj+TE UJ+laAlfaPv719W9QeMdE8zTRBkkhilfa6UiuTHb/viNKDEl6Zfp8gPyvBCf+pzDLmGa 044Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530rKuyAOAqH6tR7imq5IGuCROqhJNTwikKjVEP8RZq3TTj2Wlzk AbQOT8Q/PmIxG7bTKdcsh7Xx16uSe+M=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxdEc/pV8hbpALoz7V4gLnkRfni7+W4Ne1PW7xgXr4wnQvBXCMnu4ppejrlp7tnxsNeFpVRuQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:298c:b0:518:afaf:f7cd with SMTP id cj12-20020a056a00298c00b00518afaff7cdmr41304807pfb.23.1654008000985; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-67-169-103-239.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.169.103.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m22-20020a17090ab79600b001e31474c0c1sm1993900pjr.47.2022.05.31.07.39.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 31 May 2022 07:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Message-Id: <9AF23522-3E40-4A9F-97A0-56BB498FCEEC@tony.li>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_18470103-9893-486E-9B7F-E74C60F141D9"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.60.0.1.1\))
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 07:39:59 -0700
In-Reply-To: <9DAC94AC-573D-4557-A5D0-2DFF748DBA4E@gmail.com>
Cc: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
References: <b660b14c-b9ee-16a6-b599-6d0789f363db@pi.nu> <D7CC2043-020B-4E8E-9C01-5879868CEE96@tony.li> <9DAC94AC-573D-4557-A5D0-2DFF748DBA4E@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.60.0.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/mAam8t49GWQXk5bcdv0nqej0zGE>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll 1: ISD and PSD in the MNA Framework
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 14:40:03 -0000

>>> Note, a Network Action may not require inclusion of Ancillary Data.
>> 
>> 
>> I disagree.  A network action MUST be able to require Ancillary Data.  Example: consider the network slice identifier function.  It may reasonably require a slice identifier be included as Ancillary Data.  Similarly, an entropy network action would require an entropy value as ancillary data.
> 
> 
> Hi Tony
> 
> I think there is a misunderstanding here.
> 
> The intent is to say that an NA may not need AD and thus there may not need to be any AD in the packet.
> 
> If an NA needs AD then it absolutely must be able to get it carried in the packet.
> 
> - Stewart


Hi Stewart,

I agree with your restatement.

T