Re: [mpls] Working Group adoption of draft-farrel-mpls-sfc

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 29 March 2018 12:05 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48A61204DA; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 05:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EeDXM9qIfpTm; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 05:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22f.google.com (mail-wr0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 697281200B9; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 05:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id l49so5179992wrl.4; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 05:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=0eoQTMt4EYfgx7SMG7virKLWmGpMNJ5rCjB10bywi9g=; b=Htuuer/ffK/uqCf/2dzrhP3q2FP09HTPjEdmT7Yje+kdajiCYJEFYCqJjRcpH07OYc nSyg550NIoWu/dN45CSBOD04Nyk4FNI8qq6NTy+FPgXagVm9ZBG+RJOAZZ++mAOBihd3 NMnxKCEiVRaVn2ToxUdTok1dsS5QUQevK5vVaHqbUbQ4t+EgEYq3nL+KuNP/3iygF/08 ir2LIp/CC5THxLgmjb4+o2Hzc3pXNBxd8KqBkEqd/oQxJsPEBmeozj5PVWtVMKB4uKG+ tRdLBvZCWHsND5HlOn+Y0dzwxQ2Wy7upXzgU7On9TdK5Ai/dlNbz714P2KVBOdJoyYfn 4Mkw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0eoQTMt4EYfgx7SMG7virKLWmGpMNJ5rCjB10bywi9g=; b=tjOhTrdlM5574VbVoK/0Qs2vq1j1VAaw3YH7BMcm8ILB8U89FvbQlGqIdLHo5omY8F xGUI3HIRgKT0B7PnTbNjtbPsQbd97UFCamTtlqpC0Tg8eaZn+sq3FN6AC4dJydSdyv74 DeIamsuZ1Wt3ghooml71Ynm2nyCm7ifVg1telytEZBRyxE4vj+282UY3vaEh3CO56Oks fw8ThAChxL64oW+FD8qvtjRif6Ar9Ef2AAoaMUjozVC5/Rf613e0zKrie5PjzStbyCdV 29g8EbNw31zCVXvBzIKM1gTuZ/P2LXrX6vZFPRGDFYK9MWhFozFTWDja+uAF1l+HwdCS 61pw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7E/vHEO0JfP6NadHfFHb+jvw//ZEgVewNIPjnKXebeWc2hGg/hU jk4yCC6SBrwscw1EwP/fbeA5G6chHhF9Hozaejg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48hca82QX6BQZTzBOzhkICl7oLkcOv5tbl8V33zyrdBBeLLDZeEz5wDXGbJIwdW5j30KytbzU1W0GuALr4Q7EI=
X-Received: by 10.223.196.141 with SMTP id m13mr6192805wrf.173.1522325150672; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 05:05:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.28.222.197 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2018 05:05:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <DB5PR07MB158998C7FAAB4831C243D88D83A30@DB5PR07MB1589.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <2ac6b61d-3a38-1aaf-62ae-d923f1ad7468@pi.nu> <a392880f-6b86-4406-a348-42398e24285a.xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com> <DB5PR07MB158998C7FAAB4831C243D88D83A30@DB5PR07MB1589.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 14:05:50 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: a3BYGK1akN49tUafb8CJcxA3AqI
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERnJNad6Awo+-2dU2kz6rwx-HQEniXcWgjoWUd-zm3r2qQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>
Cc: "徐小虎(义先)" <xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>, mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-farrel-mpls-sfc <draft-farrel-mpls-sfc@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045f526ed6ad0105688bf160"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/VQihNv4yb6M9Hh_DOLH30y5T0BI>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Working Group adoption of draft-farrel-mpls-sfc
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 12:05:55 -0000

Hey Wim,

It is very obvious on what basis this adoption happened ....

If ADs do not take any serious action here it will progress smooth & direct
to RFC.

I am only a bit puzzled why the WG last call has not started yet on this
:/.

Best,
R.


On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <
wim.henderickx@nokia.com> wrote:

> Similar comment here on what basis do we adopt this. There were serious
> issues and although a new draft was posted they have not been addressed. On
> what basis do you adopt this? I thought IETF works on basis of consensus
> and in my view this was not achieved so far.
>
> From iPhone
> ------------------------------
> *From:* mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of 徐小虎(义先) <
> xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 28, 2018 10:17:04 AM
> *To:* mpls; mpls@ietf.org
> *Cc:* draft-farrel-mpls-sfc; mpls-chairs@ietf.org; sfc@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [mpls] Working Group adoption of draft-farrel-mpls-sfc
>
> Hi Loa,
>
> I don't believe the modification in Section 6 of draft-farrel-mpls-sfc (
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-farrel-mpls-sfc-05.txt) has
> eliminated the serious conflict with the SR-MPLS-based SFC approach as
> described in  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-mpls-service-
> chaining-03 (note that this draft has been merged into
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-clad-spring-sr-service-chaining-00),
> as had been pointed by many people before.
>
> Therefore, it seems a little bit unreasonable to hurry the adoption of the
> current version, IMHO.
>
> Xiaohu
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
> 2018年3月28日(星期三) 15:56
> mpls@ietf.org <mpls@ietf.org>
> draft-farrel-mpls-sfc <draft-farrel-mpls-sfc@ietf.org>; sfc@ietf.org <
> sfc@ietf.org>; mpls-chairs@ietf.org <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
> [mpls] Working Group adoption of draft-farrel-mpls-sfc
>
> Working Group,
>
> The MPLS working group have decided to adopt draft-farrel-mpls-sfc-05 as
> an MPLS working group document.
>
> Can the authors please post draft-ietf-mpls-sfc-00, without any other
> than administrative (filename, version and dates) changes.
>
> /Loa
> for the MPLS wg chairs
>
> --
>
>
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
>