Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Sat, 05 May 2018 01:33 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68FE12704A; Fri, 4 May 2018 18:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=BSzbpltK; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=GL7BMbcm
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wWZt7dcGg6tD; Fri, 4 May 2018 18:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EB4D126BF6; Fri, 4 May 2018 18:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4D921846; Fri, 4 May 2018 21:33:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 04 May 2018 21:33:28 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; bh=+bWvrkP1I+fZ2LP3LxP3LATwIKdJeG93tyYuEbzzcFM=; b=BSzbpltK 79E1E+ohkRgfaVLFRvDTyW1eIuS+Mxp6Xe2LJ/nZ9x8l97ND0tz2I33va8zv9SeO 2qz9WtrwbeGGAk5XLUQ6RTMePo8c0A/LeuSIo1GSrHwMer0J715bZzDaQbcMkYSx nhxVrkutX8w4LyHvEqJcMIOb8ETxUH77eAnSKrg9KFaplZE53HA/eQUDPu6EUpWf 9vdlgfgzQb5MsFKEsK3e4A1SY6JnlMcXt7dC/HUyGAjDllEz8oK5XIINtqmeG+ba awhOjWPAAXRk1GWuZO9nUocn0tfEM8sW9WSP1ZTC+TabOeCnF5qHDfH7bIxm473N E1urN6V7kmk31w==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=+bWvrkP1I+fZ2LP3LxP3LATwIKdJe G93tyYuEbzzcFM=; b=GL7BMbcmCqMtOSR6PayZiZoh5YXDCf3JJPAGUDdGD3PDy MSfcmOAMCdtLoxOXnvDY1vIO+cicB0te0c0oW7JxO13ct6bCbR+UHqHFDrQrLMhN xI5h7H9VTXQUt3flDI9knlZs86kKfQ8PDx7oLlxCNZv4cHsqN7h7uND62LloPtP7 +XfGDrLupkZboH1CDdkn+162+ZTT2N6KdilcK3Sa/9iZX/Q4Lew/hZVMq/bLHP6P Lkc+MP9+kJkFgND5Qsqh9Y/13IezvqrS46YqiFul7auwGpekwtFouEk2rVFgtfhr RH09Aisx3Hg2i4IqjRZNCOZDTxEjNbpHTrpCgHP/g==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:6AntWnCyMcSUU0djWhSJ1cTib-Ek3zityOqgT_u5HVUOCuPL-A3rrw>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.86]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 53219E491A; Fri, 4 May 2018 21:33:28 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F3F77B95-5EAE-4722-B1C1-4229241F735B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <7b2a29c1-51e8-27b9-7944-63093c6e1965@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 21:33:27 -0400
Cc: ietf <IETF@ietf.org>, "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <714EF623-F135-494E-9210-F8C6FDF1CFCB@cooperw.in>
References: <7b2a29c1-51e8-27b9-7944-63093c6e1965@cisco.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/EfJIJpH3WnBngxIgsYz72fQp-Wo>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 May 2018 01:33:31 -0000

I wanted to provide my summary of conclusions resulting from list discussions before and after Eliot posted the list of additional requirements discussed during IETF LC:
No smoking - We have proposed text to add to Section 3.1, which captures current (implied) practice already. No consensus to add anything specifically actionable about mold.
Gender-neutral rest rooms - No consensus to add.
Child care facilities (including infant feeding and family restroom) - No consensus to add. It sounds like there are non-criteria-related considerations for IASA to take a look at regarding child care.
Conflicts regarding people with special needs or disabilities - Determined to not be criteria-related.
Budget hotels - Already present in Section 3.2.
I pushed IESG processing on this document to early June so the community will have time to review the changes once Eliot posts a rev.

Alissa