Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Tue, 01 May 2018 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349141243FE; Tue, 1 May 2018 06:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=iUN0r28T; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=H8CPEHJ5
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dwbNtP19BitI; Tue, 1 May 2018 06:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47D121200F1; Tue, 1 May 2018 06:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F533227F4; Tue, 1 May 2018 09:46:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 01 May 2018 09:46:07 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; bh=Y2y2ZMy/YGkgSziZk+T6ioKz5pZa5TfzsqOhhcF+3Xg=; b=iUN0r28T R3T+a247hjt1S9zCtF2kOzK2TUlnKJQuE26+JUruMk8WnGSuNA77a69oOBDAOIoK AVSvRDRpQiqlLmrr+ahnwRWC/zQo3WAZQs5DM+r4z1UWuUG91MUhLxCO5wtVncy5 51b0RRxJfZO/DditA9jJY96209wrpy31e4GvDzveEJyV7b7Ab/LK0Z1bixLz+JJg QWKFhAQhg2GCcDTPgyeuqC+0NrFzaD920zFVu3QQ9ezYmjU+KF0DZ3VijGDGwi6R 0CGwhZefrxM4ADssnbW7pkqS+/nbTlVfrL3F2kQrGTavG4RmxyS3EAtJGzZGthwu N4oVRt+ZwVAQCQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Y2y2ZMy/YGkgSziZk+T6ioKz5pZa5 TfzsqOhhcF+3Xg=; b=H8CPEHJ5iFNljwQXBQQXP8jUMqTX4hgEtLK1+kw+NEpjh cEsSe7k1uktYepo8rsmkIVem+mP9BssobPZQHw2Wq2orvZyJ8cPS0NYvgMccpxlL z5PAAT30TqL8cF8nJu1uHeMukecet44h9+s86ejPr5yZhEYFP1nn8u5imtNNTrFo I7oeio5j/QECSbqt7CRIIEYDYw0WqLbGsPns/YBluC/FYknhu5JsmnBd/5LJ8nrV Od2no09NVKLcHEk58Irm5LZh5RtlHR+tn7CkoRyt0QAQWPaMbnaR1DhGEkxNoo91 rituMcx2ugsBbREx9lqX8h+7S6caO/EQtXfL+spsg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:n2_oWv6KdmKu9xfGAcnmMk9fY9uN6WwqWFhFZAxC-qzIuQ70tfua1w>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (nccm-cmcs-client.cisco.com [173.38.117.70]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E71E61038E; Tue, 1 May 2018 09:46:06 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_117A29A9-49D4-4200-A03B-A4CF449CCA0C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <CA+0Hr7syW5Jy8eyQxBU_GCbL+Omj0uR-x6bBB_Y0PjcNQ8wM2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 09:46:06 -0400
Cc: ietf <IETF@ietf.org>, mtgvenue@ietf.org
Message-Id: <A1A1BC2A-9DFE-42AB-B93F-B80C306C9C01@cooperw.in>
References: <CA+0Hr7syW5Jy8eyQxBU_GCbL+Omj0uR-x6bBB_Y0PjcNQ8wM2g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Beatrice Martini <mail@beatricemartini.it>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/rD82mjUgtf470oaY_3w7WzB7xiw>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 13:46:11 -0000

Wearing no hats, I wanted to share a few thoughts about one section below.

> On Apr 25, 2018, at 3:55 PM, Beatrice Martini <mail@beatricemartini.it> wrote:
> 
> >    3. Child care facilities - Proposed Section 3.3
> 
> Feedback:
> Add two notes to Section 3.3. Other Considerations.
> 
> Proposed texts:
> "It is desirable for Venue and Facilities to have at least one dedicated infant feeding room and one family restroom.”

My experience based on having traveled to many meetings and conferences with small children is that the above two accommodations are two among a much larger list of potential accommodations that allow parents to have the smoothest meeting experience possible when attending with children. Other items include means of heating and cooling food and milk, availability of cribs and high chairs, ability to have children’s items delivered to the conference venue, etc. Each parent’s ideal list of such accommodations is likely different and yet none of these accommodations are necessarily required for a parent to be able to attend a meeting with their child. So I’m not sure why we would specifically call out the infant feeding room and the family restroom.

Alissa