Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process
Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Mon, 23 April 2018 15:45 UTC
Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31521205D3; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 08:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IQJntMMelhy6; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 08:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22c.google.com (mail-lf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0A5112702E; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 08:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id y15-v6so7576317lfj.0; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 08:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=j1n9BgTykQ+TrtE9+oFGNwlosBNy9axpjLRJaA5awx4=; b=gvoxlzyPbZ0M0zPT5b9ZuRN7WolBp78sAqgE5g1Sxmcg/z7oVsTTdit9QQcrtMjZSJ JfxmrmG/K4Y3x8pf39mhCc3cyVS8AGRsYYmOE69QFA/da0ebkgMfFqGkXaLLhqGQGTeP FOZ3zcmtP779DKF+B95abG2FLF5W0lZ7AI5Iyp1OHtuP420dO0XKLugQtwcOjmuhxCfA dMuuf8wDkThAH7OiT1AeprsLRSWXy1ME9fK9O9z1lU5/jiS+yJMic58SS0/4iCerqrxS ISbTj8U6P93Js/T+bbMyTjUY5LUeo70Zz2s4yJdFiN99N5ihtfCG+RsX5eSoEdM//vDl gJOw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=j1n9BgTykQ+TrtE9+oFGNwlosBNy9axpjLRJaA5awx4=; b=SvRmgkxEEI+L0UGaYrs395rU3U9jeTUSxjDVKxuvYsoO6FGOlMLzV4TV4QFsdd6s/H gAurLJnkdjzDmzSiIDCeLqS1ruRcrUPB/7O2Y+0H/05H2H+Ki5KVr+X58HaMj6M3GRTD 6cidNsgWNlLS91DN1TQNw+PrP9/iFzzKhKPN9Kp9wKK5wIYPxgcHHe/OE56Z0fc3JeMM ACV0MTxuGmmxHc/A1nk3bQthNptlAihj1pn3AKQqR1gIcI/te9iJ95sxukm0C5uqfdBJ Bjpzb6dAQw/GpvhjEwKZ8p0VQm21Zmoe0GJ0dwUT46NcIOwsKa3uzKis/vNf9l5DeuFR Mj4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tAyS9ohQxFlL18JdwjPTchOAGdOv5uHmf1pJTGtJcro3o3mouZt e8sMdWge79RtCGyLB0sK6UmlU9U/Vv9/sHWozB8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZo8ucjbcWNriUFzGMqMBAQpYItbTkbdZ63CUKyAyt4oe6joi3an+vrfxx3Ie99769ZRSf5oOAhsYW4M5drqoDU=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:1462:: with SMTP id k95-v6mr9634605lfi.23.1524498346933; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 08:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.43.66 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 08:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7b2a29c1-51e8-27b9-7944-63093c6e1965@cisco.com>
References: <7b2a29c1-51e8-27b9-7944-63093c6e1965@cisco.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:45:46 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN4UeFP6Fh=gan7aCFMgw7Y4e=ZJjOU6cfdPfq_e2cPZCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Cc: ietf <IETF@ietf.org>, "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006e020c056a85ee41"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/bunPh0bke2E2ZyJkJHBpzWnwhcc>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 15:45:52 -0000
Eliot, I guess you missed my buried post: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg107499.html My suggestion is that if we are including anything about no smoking, I would certainly hope we'd be concerned about the impact on air quality from mold. It's not uncommon to find commercial buildings with water damaged acoustic ceiling tiles. And, if you see water damage on the room facing side, then you certainly will have more on the ceiling facing side. In the case of Singapore those tiles were sagging. Molds love acoustic ceiling tiles. And, given my reaction, they likely had Aspergillus mold growing on them. Aspergillus produces Ochratoxin A which has many known negative health impacts. Molds like this can cause respiratory issues even in healthy individuals. I'm happy to point to research documenting these impacts. Interestingly, research shows that mycotoxins found in tobacco are also a factor in the health impacts of cigarette smoking. And, while one might think I was the only one impacted in Singapore, 25% of the population has the predisposition to be made ill. Beyond respiratory impacts, there are many other non-specific symptoms that could easily be attributed to other causes. For example, people might have attributed symptoms to other causes such as the flu and the exposure will increase the risk of getting the flu and other respiratory illnesses. Anyone that finds they are getting sicker more frequently since Singapore might consider this as a factor. The impact is additive over time and each subsequent exposure results in a more intense reaction sooner. Here's an article indicating that up to 50% of illnesses are due to mold exposure: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3654247/ Regards, Mary. On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote: > There are currently five additional requirements under consideration: > > 1. No smoking - Proposed Section 3.1 > 2. Gender-neutral rest rooms - Proposed Section 3.3 > 3. Child care facilities - Proposed Section 3.3 > 4. Conflicts regarding people with special needs or disabilities ??? > 5. Budget hotels - Already present in Section 3.2 > > > At the moment there is proposed text for (1) and (3). I do not have text > for (2) or (4) yet. I believe Pete asked for feedback from the IAOC on (2) > in particular, and I have questions regarding what to write on (4). It > seems we are zooming in on closing the last point (5) with no changes. > > Eliot > > _______________________________________________ > Mtgvenue mailing list > Mtgvenue@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue > >
- [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-i… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Mary Barnes
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Beatrice Martini
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Bob Hinden
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… John C Klensin
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Randy Bush
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… John C Klensin
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Alissa Cooper