Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process
John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Tue, 01 May 2018 23:44 UTC
Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9940512AAB6; Tue, 1 May 2018 16:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hZdqQ_G2jnp4; Tue, 1 May 2018 16:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26A42129C6E; Tue, 1 May 2018 16:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1fDew7-0005hg-Qh; Tue, 01 May 2018 19:43:55 -0400
Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 19:43:49 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
cc: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, mtgvenue@ietf.org, ietf <IETF@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <A000D4CB462D1CD5461A466A@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <3CAE6814-F809-4D94-8680-F00A8F715685@mnot.net>
References: <CA+0Hr7syW5Jy8eyQxBU_GCbL+Omj0uR-x6bBB_Y0PjcNQ8wM2g@mail.gmail.com> <A1A1BC2A-9DFE-42AB-B93F-B80C306C9C01@cooperw.in> <7A3D61FB-40B2-456B-A174-407AF42783A5@gmail.com> <97CC171E239852CA5145CA09@PSB> <3CAE6814-F809-4D94-8680-F00A8F715685@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/IF2DTRRuIJ2pNhSvO5P-eNHymqI>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 23:44:01 -0000
--On Wednesday, May 2, 2018 08:35 +1000 Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > On 2 May 2018, at 7:14 am, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> > wrote: >> Given the above (and implicitly incorporating at least some >> of > Alissa's comments), do you believe it is necessary and > >> appropriate that we change our procedures to give parents >> with > small children (and possibly other groups with special >> issues) > priority on bookings in the meeting hotel? > It seems like we could borrow from common practice on public > transport; if you're pregnant / with small children / > mobility-challenged (permanently or temporarily), you get > access to a separate hotel booking block / preferred seating > in the meeting rooms. Mark, Again, I was trying to ask whether people thought this was desirable and appropriate, not how to do it if that conclusion were reached. Your suggestion is about the (or at least an) obvious way to do it if that conclusion were reached. That said, an observation to save others, especially IAOC members, time. While I'm pleased that it has apparently not been a problem for Montreal, we seem to routinely have complain-fests about the main hotel room block selling out almost as soon as reservations open. Now think about the effect of reserving a block of unknown but probably large size (because we don't have even a rough estimate of how many people would want to use it) on that sometimes already-tight situation and be careful what you wish for. best, john
- [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-i… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Mary Barnes
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Beatrice Martini
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Bob Hinden
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… John C Klensin
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Randy Bush
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… John C Klensin
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgven… Alissa Cooper