IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 01 May 2018 22:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3DC712EAE0; Tue, 1 May 2018 15:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=moKjGlub; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=mY6vTvdS
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2wD4v4fzMxf8; Tue, 1 May 2018 15:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A033912EA67; Tue, 1 May 2018 15:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1A121AFD; Tue, 1 May 2018 18:35:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 01 May 2018 18:35:26 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Te0gKFR4BVVYXYiFzOFY74+e4p08H XBlPhFm8c1WpVw=; b=moKjGlubZx9A8E3FJNXHK4QxsI2YeE0sh1Cacr/chqjWN fCKzn5EmDAS+cUtzkoNyj/DEpssQLfg+id5twsxi2cAiIlHC+XJFV6x3Fot1r/Zd Uc30BNP02iz4lIcyOkYZDwtw0S1T4QbvrHHnQ7oBQPzI4wNeJ0uY1qQDRfO6Sg/E aCiSjkkeQkD+a1NCYsA16ybtWUH2CxqjRm2vp4FXN9OkMFpQBPB9A9igRDEjakvO vCiPGVGBiIA5erRP/nQLpY3EShsUqM5XTAA3Ts/2DgWPBjilngXfHbFnnxWbNyxL D3h1M3IXanxWfWW0hem6twB1BaZ6PKtkufL/SZRKA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Te0gKF R4BVVYXYiFzOFY74+e4p08HXBlPhFm8c1WpVw=; b=mY6vTvdS/95NmtzbjHYygk eivEVC0XI7smiFqaiB2DzQfd/H9Gu+uUsMHmlhxhgOZNi/vvlIRrk7dJE4iBHNYY eSuCrzkeDUr6Y5yUl4osQYLzbS7isaBNLStQvl4Gqve+nNjShqm+iHeb3C/FEJoE uvD2xgbYgef4eMnO5XVsVlaADYZYdftold6NX8pVuSsKWlriG1kNdb+DEmDR9GNJ MzCSAL1N2RKBSiiuviQsn0OEddcrx9zz6vu7LeHI/Eiq1elC9UoqezThQzHGnSbI I9cSMPykV3e7GIJ5xYAPyB+QZlE237/NabxHilLL/Vx55gwpi66d4FhlCpJ3o7Mg ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:revoWnf__0r22PwFk0xuv4gVJfaCBEhV7ZRDjGMWia1DHOltWJvH6g>
Received: from [192.168.1.25] (unknown [144.136.175.28]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B1EA210253; Tue, 1 May 2018 18:35:23 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <97CC171E239852CA5145CA09@PSB>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 08:35:20 +1000
Cc: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, mtgvenue@ietf.org, ietf <IETF@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3CAE6814-F809-4D94-8680-F00A8F715685@mnot.net>
References: <CA+0Hr7syW5Jy8eyQxBU_GCbL+Omj0uR-x6bBB_Y0PjcNQ8wM2g@mail.gmail.com> <A1A1BC2A-9DFE-42AB-B93F-B80C306C9C01@cooperw.in> <7A3D61FB-40B2-456B-A174-407AF42783A5@gmail.com> <97CC171E239852CA5145CA09@PSB>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/RHHTpxZVpvsKnaAyAeusMEAlvz4>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] editor's take on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 22:35:32 -0000

On 2 May 2018, at 7:14 am, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
> 
> Given the above (and implicitly incorporating at least some of
> Alissa's comments), do you believe it is necessary and
> appropriate that we change our procedures to give parents with
> small children (and possibly other groups with special issues)
> priority on bookings in the meeting hotel?

It seems like we could borrow from common practice on public transport; if you're pregnant / with small children / mobility-challenged (permanently or temporarily), you get access to a separate hotel booking block / preferred seating in the meeting rooms.

Cheers,

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email