Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns

Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@icsi.berkeley.edu> Fri, 29 June 2012 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E082D21F8778; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1340983944; bh=rohcep6+ZsBJu27oBn2/62tFcD/r0VKdsJe5kDhlTSo=; h=Mime-Version:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Message-Id:References:To:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=XDgi/DsooKSimuspJPicwmaI8cKoQYRpd6951QZbBVNa4kXmtlbIupjbfZiaJ4Psx KpXCy0LSosYnmV9nli07uNECxG3il1MFPoG/HZyzCjJUkC/696PbpgbzYr5NX8Mfjj yRb8X7T8h2o4IHIuGnc5K++AGewrKYS4IzWC1T+E=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CEF21F8702 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:32:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fombB8PMYoWh for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rock.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (rock.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU [192.150.186.19]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80D021F8778 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9332C400D; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU
Received: from rock.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (maihub.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id SVlPeWBsTAk4; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gala.icir.org (gala [192.150.187.49]) (Authenticated sender: nweaver) by rock.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1C222C4002; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
From: Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@icsi.berkeley.edu>
In-Reply-To: <21DEB429-D133-4C34-BFA8-F057E50977A8@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:32:20 -0700
Message-Id: <AFA48774-57DF-42FB-9028-C26F648F4EF0@icsi.berkeley.edu>
References: <1340433313.43178.YahooMailClassic@web161701.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <B726DEA1-2E57-4E67-B481-5788CB26869E@vpnc.org> <CAMm+Lwh1J8+LB44X0XmUm+Fob1bSrdJLY76Vr8qsUx0yeDat+A@mail.gmail.com> <F17B354A-7D6D-4532-AA9B-8AB5D35A4BF8@rfc1035.com> <21DEB429-D133-4C34-BFA8-F057E50977A8@cisco.com>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: DNSEXT Working Group <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

On Jun 29, 2012, at 8:18 AM, Ralph Droms wrote:
> Agreed that it's a bad idea.  Can you be more specific - why is it not technically sound and lacking in engineering merit?
> 
> I ask to provide support for any decision not to pursue this work in the IETF.

It is fundamentally incompatible with DNSSEC, as DNSSEC, in practice, relies on knowing A root key.

It is fundamentally incompatible with the concept of names being global: that is, example.com is controlled by the same entity when observed anywhere in the world.

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext