Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns

SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 20 June 2012 07:42 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B5D21F8714; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1340178179; bh=1py4fIZeA2PLBOx7nAbIlW43nr47ncgid/DSsaXQkXc=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender; b=A93TouSdHk0aVrwJb2n87s9MP5SgiSh/5VJ6+Xve0f9Y6T9bBP7jWULVMcdc/4OPq JAvXHs5WQDjBnJVsIpuoF+G5C/FwbrqUr/yLKWR1oVzF8DwG9ez7GCP0pP6fSYtfsA r2DmWCGaVPqI4HxbCU8CurrUClezv7+7zi/qw5/4=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A5621F86F2 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.047, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bDOQdXMsCWww for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 191D321F8714 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5K7gkdl007142; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1340178174; i=@resistor.net; bh=ZAgUhzYmpJSc1+w4RTWANwz0VgSIPOLfqsxkvP74CiY=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=1QhPQo+M/NUlsPJhOnoiAQhaxx4cy8Z3PDlvGInLcwy+JgKM8bvfbBalARAalzZT3 vfC6echFBzUt1NFvUtCHzDu7b8h7HJjNK/mS8vAnHtm5MioEdvurNC2hgroXO8DiiE FhHwXQp4mrJs/Gxo4WgJNkaOQcsPQ6HNiT/Ih6Rs=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1340178174; i=@resistor.net; bh=ZAgUhzYmpJSc1+w4RTWANwz0VgSIPOLfqsxkvP74CiY=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=u36WEAXpBlc05Bok/S8u+pQZbgreSVKQm9hj8H9aFBcuTDVY7J0vzQJWRt0DssfFQ 5HEiA4eb6Gki6pcymCzEEn7Imlw1RLsygXBTAb8spUb6Q4kUSv6N8tpoj2VZiwpyUy sA8z9a8R5fq77Z90C/W8sho8uvR6Qpkw1KYA6KSQ=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120619230716.09380bb0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:41:36 -0700
To: dnsext@ietf.org, Yuping Diao <teacherdddd@yahoo.com.cn>, Ming Liao <644247110@qq.com>, Yongping Diao <diaoyp@yahoo.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BF001997-32AC-4221-AF0F-B529D9127EDD@nic.cz>
References: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1206171731130.18692@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <BF001997-32AC-4221-AF0F-B529D9127EDD@nic.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

At 05:58 18-06-2012, Ondrej Sury wrote:
>Exactly.  And then it would be just a mess - every country would 
>create it's own Internet.

It would be like letting a hundred flowers bloom for the governance people.

>not that I promote the usage of existing tools for Internet censorship,
>but at least those are just tools, and not the justification to split
>the Internet.

Nowadays it is simply referred to as legally restricted content.

>Last, but not least, we (IETF) should produce technical documents
>and not political.  This is quite nice example of a document which

The IETF produces political documents dressed up as technical 
proposals.  They rarely take a line as in this draft as they are 
usually about technology.

In the Introduction Section:

   "Internet Domain Name System (DNS) distributes domain name and IP
    address for the host on the Internet."

What does the above mean?

   "In current Internet domain name hierarchy, the root DNS server
    authorizes and distributes all sub-layer DNS servers."

That doesn't match the current definition.  It has been said that "to 
remain a global network, the Internet requires the existence of a 
globally unique public name space".

Do the authors of draft-diao-aip-dns-00 share the view that:

   (a) It is essential to have a common symbol set; and

   (b) common semantic interpretation of these symbols

In Section 2.3:

   "In order to realize the transition from Internet to Autonomous
    Internet, each partition of current Internet should first realize
    possible self-government and gradually reduce its dependence on the
    foreign domain names, such as COM, NET et al."

It is somewhat simplistic to look at domain names as a way to 
transition the Internet to some other form.

Regards,
-sm

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext