Re: [Nea] Consensus check on EAP-based PT

[Stephen McCann <[e-mail]>]

Dear all,
             my choice is for option 2)

Kind regards

Stephen

>> On Aug 2, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Susan Thomson (sethomso) wrote:
>>
>>> At IETF81 and several prior IETF meetings, as well as on the mailing
>>> list, the WG has evaluated the pros and cons of 2 architectural
>>> approaches to carrying posture within an EAP tunnel method:
>>>
>>> - EAP method
>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hanna-nea-pt-eap-01.txt
>>>
>>> - EAP TLV.
>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cam-winget-eap-tlv-03.txt
>>>
>>> So far, there has been no WG consensus to adopt one architecture versus
>>> the other. (At the recent F2F meeting in Quebec City, the consensus
>>> check at the meeting showed an equal number in favor of each approach.)
>>>
>>> This email is a final call to determine WG consensus on the L2 PT
>>> approach.
>>>
>>> The consensus check is to choose one of the following 3 options:
>>> 1) PT-EAP approach
>>> 2) NEA-TLV approach
>>> 3) Neither (please state the reason if you choose this option)
>>>
>>> Please respond to the above question by Tues Aug 16 at 5pm PT. Please do
>>> so even if you have already expressed your opinion, either at a WG
>>> meeting or on the mailing list. The answer can be as brief as selecting
>>> option 1), 2) or 3). If you would like to add your reasons for your
>>> choice, that would be appreciated too, especially if you choose option
>>> 3).
>>>
>>> If we have consensus on the mailing list, we will adopt the selected
>>> approach.
>>>
>>> If we still do not have consensus, the WG chairs and AD (Stephen
>>> Farrell) have agreed that the AD will make a decision. The proponents of
>>> both approaches have agreed to abide by this decision. This resolution
>>> plan was discussed at the F2F meeting at IETF81. This plan was also
>>> communicated to the list in an email on Jun 30, 2011. No objections have
>>> been received.
>>>
>>> In either case, the individual submission corresponding to the selected
>>> approach will be adopted as a -00 NEA WG I-D, and we will proceed with
>>> the normal process of editing the document within the WG.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Susan
>>>
>>> ------------------
>>> References:
>>> IETF81 audio session (start at approx 44 mins into session):
>>> http://www.ietf.org/audio/ietf81/ietf81-2103-20110727-1256-pm.mp3
>>>
>>> IETF81 draft meeting minutes:
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/nea/minutes
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nea mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nea mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea
>>
>