IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] Netconf Light or Netconf for constrained devices

Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net> Sat, 31 March 2012 15:10 UTC

Return-Path: <phil@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D9D21F8589 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.088, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zgplXNONeilZ for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og119.obsmtp.com (exprod7og119.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03B521F8559 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:10:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob119.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT3ceZJIS1XPMAjVOgxOjDLyaBTXV7I4E@postini.com; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:10:32 PDT
Received: from magenta.juniper.net (172.17.27.123) by P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:10:24 -0700
Received: from idle.juniper.net (idleski.juniper.net [172.25.4.26]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id q2VFAN180638; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:10:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phil@juniper.net)
Received: from idle.juniper.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by idle.juniper.net (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2VFAkIG082223; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:10:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from phil@idle.juniper.net)
Message-ID: <201203311510.q2VFAkIG082223@idle.juniper.net>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
In-Reply-To: <20120331093809.GB70620@elstar.local>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:10:46 -0400
From: Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: "'netconf@ietf.org'" <netconf@ietf.org>, "Cole, Robert G CIV USARMY CERDEC (US)" <robert.g.cole.civ@mail.mil>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Netconf Light or Netconf for constrained devices
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:10:33 -0000

Juergen Schoenwaelder writes:
>On constrained devices, you do not need subtree filtering nor do you
>have the resources to implement edit-config. But valuable to know that
>your requirements differ from the -00 requirements as well.

Since subtree filtering is tied to the data model, can you
constrained device simply say that your data models do not
support subtree filtering?

Thanks,
 Phil

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email