IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] Netconf Light or Netconf for constrained devices

Andy Bierman <andy@netconfcentral.org> Sat, 31 March 2012 07:27 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@netconfcentral.org>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436C521F845D for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cqFemhCbCzb7 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from m1plsmtpa01-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (m1plsmtpa01-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D5821F845C for <netconf@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.216.7.195] ([93.158.42.164]) by m1plsmtpa01-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net with id s7TF1i0083YXBEd017TGKb; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:27:16 -0700
Message-ID: <4F76B1D3.1040508@netconfcentral.org>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:27:15 -0700
From: Andy Bierman <andy@netconfcentral.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120310 Thunderbird/11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: netconf@ietf.org
References: <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A640398E384@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <4F757326.8090002@bwijnen.net> <4F75E862.8000509@netconfcentral.org> <20120331051051.GA70150@elstar.local>
In-Reply-To: <20120331051051.GA70150@elstar.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Netconf Light or Netconf for constrained devices
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 07:27:18 -0000

On 03/30/2012 10:10 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:07:46AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
...
> This is kind of funny. The I-D actually says an incomplete NETCONF
> implementation calls itself 'NETCONF Light' (and not 'NETCONF'2) while
> you seem to prefer that an incomplete NETCONF implementation calls
> itself 'NETCONF' and then posts some deviations.
>


The solution defined in this draft is completely broken.
It specifies several meaningless YANG features.  They have no affect
on YANG modules whatsoever unless a module contains 'if-feature'
statements identifying which nodes are conditional for the feature.

Your solution does not use YANG correctly.

>
> /js
>

Andy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email