Re: [Netconf] Netconf Light or Netconf for constrained devices

[Andy Bierman <[e-mail]>]

On 03/30/2012 10:10 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:07:46AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
>
>> But assuming one insisted on using a subset of NETCONF for some reason,
>> one can write an applicability statement that documented how to
>> advertise the ietf-netconf module plus some deviations to
>> identify what is missing from the implementation.  (The AS is only needed
>> because we are assuming implementers are too dumb to understand RFC 6020
>> I suppose.)
>
> This is kind of funny. The I-D actually says an incomplete NETCONF
> implementation calls itself 'NETCONF Light' (and not 'NETCONF'2) while
> you seem to prefer that an incomplete NETCONF implementation calls
> itself 'NETCONF' and then posts some deviations.
>

You probably need to re-read section 5.6.4 of RFC 6020.
Advertising <uri> + deviations is the way YANG is designed.

>
> /js
>


Andy