[Netconf] Netconf Light or Netconf for constrained devices

["Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <[e-mail]>]

We would like to encourage the WG participants to
engage in a discussion on how to allow for
the use of NetConf for constrained devices.

See below the summary of our discussion at this weeks
session in IETF83.

Please express your opinions and pls describe
the pros and cons (as you see them) of each
possible approach.

It might also be good if someone (Andy?) could
summarize/describe how exactly one can in fact support
constrained devices with standard Netconf plus
a "deviations" approach. Maybe an example would be
the best way to demonstrate how that would be done.

Bert and Mehmet

On 3/30/12 10:32 AM, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich) wrote:
> NETCONF-Light:
>
> Juergen Schoenwaelder described the updated document, which defines only
> the hello message as mandatory. Andy Bierman questioned the strategy to
> provide a solution which is competing with the current NETCONF protocol
> standard, where deviations can be used to reduce the standard features
> for an implementation. The WG was in favor of the draft however the
> issue needs to be solved and needs a discussion on the maillist as one
> of the key contributors of the draft was not present. NETCONF-Light
> makes use of the TLS Pre-Shared Key (PSK) authentication introduced in
> the update of NETCONF over TLS.