IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] FW: NETCONF WG Session Summary

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Fri, 30 March 2012 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B6021F8653 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 01:42:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.188
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.188 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.061, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1OaE2ZAj1j5K for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 01:42:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FDC21F864E for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 01:42:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.46]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D20620BE9; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:42:15 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4tj9eRcSLv-k; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:42:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3181520BE2; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:42:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6BBA31E248E0; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:42:14 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:42:13 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
Message-ID: <20120330084213.GA49824@elstar.local>
Mail-Followup-To: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>, netconf@ietf.org
References: <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A640398E384@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A640398E384@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: netconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Netconf] FW: NETCONF WG Session Summary
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:42:17 -0000

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:32:16AM +0200, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich) wrote:
> Dear NETCONF WG,
> 
> please find below the summary of the NETCONF session in Paris.
> 
> The co-chairs would like to encourage the WG to debate on the issue for
> NETCONF-Light discussed during the session as noted below.
> Please discuss the pros and cons for a "netconf light with no need to
> support any capabilities" vs. a "must document deviations" approach.

There surely are more than those two options.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email