Re: [Netconf] LC on subscribed-notifications-10 review

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Thu, 22 March 2018 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D58126E01 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 12:13:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.319
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.319 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.592, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3fUDiAyUj9CP for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 12:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90433126FB3 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 12:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (h-80-27.A165.priv.bahnhof.se [212.85.80.27]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C7E971AE03B5; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 20:13:47 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:25:19 +0000 (GMT)
Message-Id: <20180322.152519.755067735748831842.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: evoit@cisco.com
Cc: balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com, kwatsen@juniper.net, netconf@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <a8b3a1f5d724498499f0c5ab291b40ae@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
References: <DA8A1569-826D-4744-B780-90CDA064D0BD@juniper.net> <ef9c874b-35dc-7f88-07de-fc6ce57d6d2b@ericsson.com> <a8b3a1f5d724498499f0c5ab291b40ae@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/URwdef8PdecA6t8J1auY3s0jDRE>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] LC on subscribed-notifications-10 review
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 19:13:51 -0000

Hi,

"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hi Balazs,
> 
> All changes listed below should be addressed.  The results can also be
> seen in...
> https://github.com/netconf-wg/rfc5277bis/blob/master/draft-ietf-netconf-subscribed-notifications-11.txt
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Netconf <netconf-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Balazs Lengyel
> > Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2018 7:01 PM
> > To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>; netconf@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [Netconf] LC on subscribed-notifications-10 review
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > My last call review. Sorry if some of the comments are already
> > mentioned.
> > I  think the document is in a good shape, ready to progress onwards
> > (if my
> > MAJOR comments are clarified.).
> > 
> > Abstract:  "Also defined are delivery mechanisms for instances of the
> > resulting notification messages."
> > Aren't these in other drafts?
> 
> Notification message definition mechanisms are defined in this
> document.  But a complete solution requires a transport draft as well.

I agree with Balazs.  Shouldn't this sentence be removed?  If not,
where in this document are these delivery mechanmisms defined?

[...]

> > P34) There really should be a filter example to show how it is applied
> > against the notification.
> 
> We took the same path as other YANG documents expressing XPATH or
> subtree filters.
>
> In any case, filters documented for those examples
> should work here without change.

Can you point to one such example?


/martin