Re: [netext] [neatest] Consensus call: Adopt I-D draft-Krishnan-neatest-update-notifications

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Thu, 15 November 2012 13:22 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B61021F88C9 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 05:22:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.444
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.444 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.155, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iHiEKXndCg+l for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 05:22:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FB621F888C for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 05:22:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E554D880A0; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 05:22:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clemson.local (c-69-140-213-249.hsd1.md.comcast.net [69.140.213.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9696E14003B; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 05:22:45 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50A4ECA6.8060204@innovationslab.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 08:22:46 -0500
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ahmad Muhanna <amuhanna@awardsolutions.com>
References: <14301_1352823115_50A2714B_14301_189_1_81C77F07008CA24F9783A98CFD706F7105CF73@PEXCVZYM12.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <24C0F3E22276D9438D6F366EB89FAEA80F5A15B3@xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com> <CAC8QAcd4KuRUz8F6FDhOUqO6r2bWwFS6+0HLc0vm1uWf-M9OKA@mail.gmail.com> <50A41580.3070901@innovationslab.net> <3359F724933DFD458579D24EAC76909859D715D8@Redwood.usa.awardsolutions.com>
In-Reply-To: <3359F724933DFD458579D24EAC76909859D715D8@Redwood.usa.awardsolutions.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netext] [neatest] Consensus call: Adopt I-D draft-Krishnan-neatest-update-notifications
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:22:46 -0000

Hi Ahmad,

On 11/14/12 5:26 PM, Ahmad Muhanna wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> When you say an informal LS, can you please elaborate?
>

Sure.  The 3GPP CT chairman sent an e-mail to the NETEXT chairs, the 
draft authors, and me asking about the status of the draft since there 
was a dependency on it within 3GPP.

Regards,
Brian