IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com> Tue, 02 October 2018 14:26 UTC

Return-Path: <rrahman@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C306130E89 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 07:26:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6UE-gYt6TKL5 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 07:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9F46130E78 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 07:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3716; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1538490368; x=1539699968; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=gqeBi6OHzPpFNlr2l+uoxUF223mWvPLfpnYgvMBSoPU=; b=milXKsGDJJkl3XDL4oVhD4Cwn83Eqv6uvl5WTUxiGAJArEPvP1/vdzM7 sOqsLO57JJPkp+Wg+uxd6aFRbYWEckfSLyD3FkwDmJoexj7VBnkAtt5Gp S7vvODIdpSLCNuXFIpWvnqhQtFHnTK1n9DVYwaBCWZ0WnP3MjrxXgK2IT Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ArAACCf7Nb/4gNJK1aGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUYIOZn8oCoNqiBWMG4FoJYM9kx8UgWYLHw2EQAIXg3chNBgBAwEBAgEBAm0cDIU4AQEBAQMjEToXBAIBCA4DAwECAwImAgICMBUICAIEARKDIQGCAaYDgS6Ed4UlgQuJeBeBQT+BEicME4JMhEsBEgEfF4JqMYImAp08CQKGRoMNhmMXgUlLhBSJMpUZAhEUgSUdOGRxcBU7KgGCQQmCHBeDRopSb4EWinyBHwGBHgEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,332,1534809600"; d="scan'208";a="460348030"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Oct 2018 14:26:07 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w92EQ79h008120 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 2 Oct 2018 14:26:07 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 09:26:06 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 09:26:06 -0500
From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00
Thread-Index: AQHUWkp2I2nNckn+1ky1f4oa9l5TQKULtr8AgABcxQA=
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 14:26:06 +0000
Message-ID: <A3E831A0-A370-4248-A8CB-ACD9B8125FBE@cisco.com>
References: <2586B82B-1703-4579-B85F-82F158954ED0@cisco.com> <0FEFF2C8-306D-4811-80B1-A075C73D1E33@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <0FEFF2C8-306D-4811-80B1-A075C73D1E33@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.b.0.180311
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.212.215]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <88958E1D9C4B0347A7C7D900E8FC66D2@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.13, xch-rcd-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/PXJMCdEZiEeVlMusIFEdKSuBTaY>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 14:26:11 -0000

No objection, I support adoption of this document.

Regards,
Reshad.


On 2018-10-02, 9:52 AM, "Kent Watsen" <kwatsen@juniper.net> wrote:

    Hi Reshad, thanks for asking.
    
    It's a grey area.  It could go either way.  Both charters support the work.  The chairs are all 50/50 as for best fit.  Squinting, it seems more an NMDA-thing than a transport-thing (i.e., not NC or RC specific), and NETMOD is more the "NMDA group" than NETCONF, at least the first-order of it seems to be that way.
    
    That said, NETCONF is overloaded and NETMOD is not (14 vs 4 drafts).  Of course, similar people are in both working groups, but it would be good to offload some discussion from the NETCONF list and give this WG something more to work on.  I hope this is okay with everyone.
    
    With respect to the adoption poll.  The important thing here is if anyone objects.  Do you or anyone else object?
    
    Kent // chair
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
    Date: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 at 8:21 AM
    To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
    Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00
    
    Kent, I may have asked this question in Montreal but I don't remember the answer: why is this document in NETMOD and not in NETCONF?
    
    Regards,
    Reshad.
    
    On 2018-10-01, 2:48 PM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" <netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of kwatsen@juniper.net> wrote:
    
        The IETF 102 in-room poll should really good support to adopt
        this draft, and no objections.
        
        This email starts an adoption poll for:
        
          https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dclemm-2Dnetmod-2Dnmda-2Ddiff-2D00&d=DwIGaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=cMA9GOjXbEWKsL9ICiakKStMZSuPfNOrlbLOOkIrdqU&s=BKA6fI-QY2tt_NTOva9I61482LGGZdzDMFBqVF1O_0s&e=
        
        Please indicate your support or objection to the adoption poll. 
        If objecting, please state your reasons on this thread.
        
        Kent (and Lou and Joel)
        
        _______________________________________________
        netmod mailing list
        netmod@ietf.org
        https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_netmod&d=DwIGaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=cMA9GOjXbEWKsL9ICiakKStMZSuPfNOrlbLOOkIrdqU&s=VClQL9M7t-fz3-dJqMGi8tK-_iyPfbyizqPA_x8VMHo&e=

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email