IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Thu, 04 October 2018 12:36 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AEA8130EBB for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 05:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.957
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.957 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.456, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D3M6Hoy902FP for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 05:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 206AC130E95 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 05:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=903; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1538656576; x=1539866176; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hEVkW0jyLaEwdz1BZJe4kLZFt3N0XiITH60m6IqyTK8=; b=mnKSLMLd3p79PkvY9vjvO+TI0Fbh8TIlySXbs7i+Ug7BjUr8bNbb/BRS +zlfk+C5gO0rzcO7P5esVBG5cLuWNWW2Fp5QIEz7iaMeXXhsWcfxclhC4 iAF4tGo9DrCrIzarwdGDvjoBVy7fHtqABRuTlGZ75RIq5Nd8mS3ezk+AS 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AiAAASCLZb/xbLJq1bGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBVAIBAQEBCwGCa38og3SIdI1LmFgNGAuEA0YChEY3Cg0BAwEBAgEBAm0cDIU6AQEBAwEBIRU2CxALDgoCAiYCAicwBg0GAgEBgx0BggEPo1WBLoR3hRgFgQuKMIFBP4E5gmuDGwEBA4RfglcCjlqOfAmGSolwBheJFIZVjBmDG4YqgVgigVUzGggbFTuCbIsWhT8+MI0XAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,338,1534809600"; d="scan'208";a="6992299"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Oct 2018 12:36:14 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.158] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-158.cisco.com [10.63.23.158]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w94CaDQo008703; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:36:13 GMT
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
Cc: phil@juniper.net, netmod@ietf.org
References: <201810031419.w93EJNpn040188@idle.juniper.net> <20181004.121417.2190375850946168105.mbj@tail-f.com>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <69afa537-9a5f-6fb6-de21-2add0ffec4b2@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 13:36:13 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20181004.121417.2190375850946168105.mbj@tail-f.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.63.23.158, dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-158.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/m3yRtlLjzX1Puxd6JZj9InOahMw>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 12:36:23 -0000


On 04/10/2018 11:14, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net> wrote:
>> Bal?zs Lengyel writes:
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00
>> [I've moved to a "deep lurker" role here, but ...]
>>
>> Can we ensure this model contains a "format" leaf in the RPC's input
>> so that future (and proprietary) formats can be supported?   That
>> leaf can be an identityref that defaults to yang-patch.
> I think this is a good idea.  I would prefer the edit-config format
> over YANG patch for describing a diff.  The edit-config format is more
> suited for this purpose imo.
+1

I would like something closer to edit-config to be available via 
RESTCONF as well.

Thanks,
Rob


>
>
> /martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> .
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email