IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-system-mgmt

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Thu, 12 December 2013 13:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEE91AE226 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 05:37:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5mpofUdaDLit for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 05:37:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [109.74.15.94]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8707C1ADBCF for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 05:37:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [193.12.32.88]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9992240C119; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:37:43 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:37:43 +0100
Message-Id: <20131212.143743.502541833.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <20131212115229.GB80315@elstar.local>
References: <20131212.085209.387856404.mbj@tail-f.com> <001b01cef716$295e2520$6b01a8c0@oemcomputer> <20131212115229.GB80315@elstar.local>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5rc2 on Emacs 23.4 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: randy_presuhn@mindspring.com, h@elstar.local, netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-system-mgmt
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:37:53 -0000

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:42:57AM -0800, Randy Presuhn wrote:
> > sysName (think IDN) might also be worth thinking about.  There was a long
> > debate
> > about this a while back; I don't know what current thinking is.
> 
> sysName is defined like this:
> 
>             "An administratively-assigned name for this managed
>             node.  By convention, this is the node's fully-qualified
>             domain name.  If the name is unknown, the value is
>             the zero-length string."

Note that /system/hostname has different semantics - sysName is *by
convention* the *fqdn*.  For this reason, /system/hostname is not
mapped to sysName in the document.


/martin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email