IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notification for draft‑gruessing‑ntp‑ntpv5‑requirements‑03.txt

Hal Murray <halmurray+ietf@sonic.net> Thu, 21 October 2021 21:16 UTC

Return-Path: <halmurray+ietf@sonic.net>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA9023A0C55 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NG9bcKrEMWgh for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE6EA3A0C53 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net (107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [107.137.68.211]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id 19LLGLUT030705 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:16:22 -0700
Received: from hgm (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by 107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B5B28C0F3; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 with nmh-1.7.1
To: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
cc: halmurray+ietf@sonic.net, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
From: Hal Murray <halmurray+ietf@sonic.net>
In-Reply-To: Message from "Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> of "Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:12:33 +0200." <61714B21020000A100044B83@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:16:21 -0700
Message-Id: <20211021211621.C0B5B28C0F3@107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net>
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVZH2Q2yhSwy7wkZZTRRed51If0yVW9G8lew9o1WvPy4/Le0jc6VqhRQYKfxLCm6gbY9AaNQ/qhiswf+bnwooY44tjGe77qVQNY=
X-Sonic-ID: C;dCvvI7Qy7BGmUyx66Nu5DA== M;BmEdJLQy7BGmUyx66Nu5DA==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: -1.5/5.0 by cerberusd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/255_8JR-OPjcNpk9DoGZGCWLxRg>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notification for draft‑gruessing‑ntp‑ntpv5‑requirements‑03.txt
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 21:16:29 -0000

Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de said:
> An other question: Can a smearing server be confused when getting smeared
> time from another smearing server? 

If a server doesn't know it is a smearing server and all the servers it uses 
are smearing, then it will be a smearing server just like smearing clients 
don't know they are smearing.



-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email