IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notification for draft-gruessing-ntp-ntpv5-requirements-03.txt

Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> Tue, 19 October 2021 08:02 UTC

Return-Path: <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133703A0867 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 01:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id slFxS1pSI2oB for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 01:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.uni-regensburg.de (mx3.uni-regensburg.de [194.94.157.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ED283A0866 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 01:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 59239600004F for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 10:01:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de (gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.5.51]) by mx3.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CEE6600004A for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 10:01:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from uni-regensburg-smtp1-MTA by gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 10:01:46 +0200
Message-Id: <616E7B69020000A10004491E@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 18.3.1
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 10:01:45 +0200
From: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
To: james.ietf@gmail.com, mlichvar@redhat.com
Cc: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, doug.arnold@meinberg-usa.com
References: <163386015957.12424.6997038478834885480@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAO+dDx=6baLhf9LwSMvR1F0ieuLO6NXmExYLDvcCF2tgchHs8w@mail.gmail.com> <DB8PR02MB5772AC97BFE2D7C1139EFDC0CFB89@DB8PR02MB5772.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <E469D9A7-7445-49D9-A8A2-82BA7BF1FA27@gmail.com> <YW2FvUiaHC/hbxkG@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <YW2FvUiaHC/hbxkG@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/HCkYf8DhEupse5xtxDAVAdRSALI>
Subject: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notification for draft-gruessing-ntp-ntpv5-requirements-03.txt
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 08:02:00 -0000

>>> Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> schrieb am 18.10.2021 um 16:33 in
Nachricht <YW2FvUiaHC/hbxkG@localhost>:

...
> Same for UTC vs TAI.

I thing the TAI offset (whole seconds) should be part of every NTPv5 timing packet. So we can keep the old timestamp format while providing TAI.
Maybe NTPv6 will demand that TAI should be the new time base. Still we would need the offset to provide UTC and similar.

...

Regards,
Ulrich

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email