Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-gruessing-ntp-ntpv5-requirements-03.txt
Steve Allen <sla@ucolick.org> Thu, 21 October 2021 19:49 UTC
Return-Path: <sla@ucolick.org>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5E03A0A01 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TBA-UlC2Mb7g for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.ucolick.org (hunan.ucolick.org [128.114.23.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4EBE3A09E8 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.ucolick.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ucolick.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED8527DF for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from geneva.ucolick.org (geneva.ucolick.org [128.114.23.183]) by smtp.ucolick.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D95C2095 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from geneva.ucolick.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by geneva.ucolick.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB5E95F for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from sla@localhost) by geneva.ucolick.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id 19LJnmLc029093 for ntp@ietf.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:49:48 -0700
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:49:48 -0700
From: Steve Allen <sla@ucolick.org>
To: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20211021194948.GC24812@ucolick.org>
References: <20211021111435.0A1E128C0F3@107-137-68-211.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net> <OFF123426F.49671C73-ONC1258775.00413019-C1258775.0041DAE2@ptb.de> <OF3FAD592A.322A19E3-ONC1258775.0049C63B-C1258775.004ADE42@ptb.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <OF3FAD592A.322A19E3-ONC1258775.0049C63B-C1258775.004ADE42@ptb.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/HOmiewUrYAM_Z3ZoxhlTy4Oqw3Y>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-gruessing-ntp-ntpv5-requirements-03.txt
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 19:49:55 -0000
On Thu 2021-10-21T15:37:45+0200 kristof.teichel@ptb.de hath writ: > The whole issue is a bit politically/socially (?) charged, where some > people have a fundamental resistance of de-coupling coordinated time from > experienced (solar) time. At the 2015 ITU-R WRC the original draft document had three options for change of the way that UTC is defined. When that draft was circulated six nations objected and the final document of options included a 4th option which was, paraphrased "You all have spent 15 years trying to redefine UTC and in all of that time none of the documents provided for consideration have explained why leap seconds exist nor the consequences for abandoning them; therefore do nothing." The result of the 2015 WRC was nothing. One problem is that most people, and the laws in most nations, expect that a legal calendar day is determined by observing the rotation of the earth. In particular, the laws in many nations explicitly state that legal time is mean solar days and/or GMT. A purely atomic time scale with no leap seconds is not mean solar time. A "UTC" without leap seconds would therefore not be legal in many places, and thus not suitable for an international recommendation. > kinda hope the solution is to increase the maximum difference to an hour, The "leap hour" was proposed early in 21st century discussions by the delgation from the USA. It was ridiculed as even harder to enforce and implement than the leap second, but at the time of that proposal the legal time of the USA was explicitly based on GMT, therefore the delegation from the USA could not legally submit a proposal that called for UTC to deviate indefinitely from mean solar time. The leap second exists in the first place because the old form of atomically coordinated time which was the international agreement in the 1960s had radio broadcasts of atomically-regulated seconds with a duration longer than the SI second which was adopted in 1967. Every national metrology agency which adopted that old scheme was able to broadcast time signals that agreed to within a millisecond. Not every nation adopted the old form of coordinated time; in particular the Soviets never used it. After the adoption of the SI second Germany passed a law which defined all legal metrology in Germany to be based on SI units, and it changed the national metrology agencies which were responsible for certifying those measurements. Responsibility for time in Germany was removed from the longstanding hydrology institute which observed the sky and given solely to PTB. PTB decided that it would be illegal to broadcast any kind of second other than the SI second, therefore in less than two years Germany would no longer conform with the existing international agreement for broadcast time signals. That started a scramble to forge a new international agreement which would be acceptable everywhere. Many meetings were ex parte, proceedings were not recorded (or even redacted -- there is one international meeting which was annulled, removed from offical history, and re-held a year later). The final tweaks to the agreement that was implemented were based on meeting with a Soviet representative in order to get USSR to join, even though those tweaks made it impossible to implement the agreement as it had been approved by the CCIR. It is clear they agreed that any new agreement must be legal in all countries, therefore it must provide mean solar time. Thus came the leap second as a means of reaching a new acceptable consensus quickly, without having to wait for most of the nations of the world to redefine legal time, and without the risk that some nations might legislate otherwise. Among the documents that did survive was an IAU report which said that leap seconds would be disastrous. Its authors recognized that they were being ignored in the haste to reach a new international agreement, but also their position did not enable them to poison such an agreement. What they could and did do was to announce that the operational radio navigation systems they controlled would be purely atomic time without leap seconds, and that astronomical times would continue to use Universal Time. That need for two different time scales was something that astronomers had recognized for decades before the leap second, but which national laws still cannot grok. -- Steve Allen <sla@ucolick.org> WGS-84 (GPS) UCO/Lick Observatory--ISB 260 Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855 1156 High Street Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015 Santa Cruz, CA 95064 https://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m
- [Ntp] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gru… James
- [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Fwd: New Version Notification f… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Doug Arnold
- [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Fwd: New Version Notificati… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… James
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… Doug Arnold
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… Danny Mayer
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… Danny Mayer
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… James
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… James
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… Danny Mayer
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… Hal Murray
- [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notification fo… Ulrich Windl
- [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notification fo… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notificatio… Danny Mayer
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notificatio… Danny Mayer
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… Miroslav Lichvar
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notificatio… Warner Losh
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… James
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notificatio… Hal Murray
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… Miroslav Lichvar
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… Miroslav Lichvar
- [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notification fo… Ulrich Windl
- [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notif… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notificatio… Hal Murray
- [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notification fo… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notificatio… Miroslav Lichvar
- [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notification fo… Ulrich Windl
- [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notification fo… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notificatio… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notificatio… Miroslav Lichvar
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notificatio… Miroslav Lichvar
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notificatio… Warner Losh
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notificatio… Tony Finch
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notificatio… Danny Mayer
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notificatio… Danny Mayer
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notificatio… Warner Losh
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notificatio… Tony Finch
- [Ntp] Antw: Re: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version N… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notificatio… Miroslav Lichvar
- [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notif… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… Dieter Sibold
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… kristof.teichel
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notificatio… Hal Murray
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notificatio… Martin Burnicki
- [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notif… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… Hal Murray
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… kristof.teichel
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version N… Martin Burnicki
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… Doug Arnold
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version N… Doug Arnold
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… kristof.teichel
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version Notificatio… Danny Mayer
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… Danny Mayer
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… James
- [Ntp] Antwort: Re: New Version Notification for d… kristof.teichel
- [Ntp] Antwort: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version No… kristof.teichel
- Re: [Ntp] Antwort: Re: New Version Notification f… Doug Arnold
- Re: [Ntp] Antwort: Re: New Version Notification f… Danny Mayer
- Re: [Ntp] New Version Notification for draft-grue… Steve Allen
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: New Version N… Hal Murray
- [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: New Ver… Ulrich Windl
- [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: New Ver… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: New… Martin Burnicki
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: New… Martin Burnicki
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: New… Martin Burnicki
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: New… Danny Mayer
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: New… Martin Burnicki
- [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] R… Ulrich Windl
- Re: [Ntp] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: New… Doug Arnold
- Re: [Ntp] [EXTERNAL] Re: Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw… Denis Reilly
- Re: [Ntp] [EXTERNAL] Re: Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw… Doug Arnold
- Re: [Ntp] [EXTERNAL] Re: Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw… Martin Burnicki
- Re: [Ntp] changes in length of day, was Re: New V… Tony Finch
- [Ntp] Antw: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Antw: Re: Antw: Re… Ulrich Windl