IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] a new draft overlapping the WG draft

ilf <ilf@zeromail.org> Thu, 29 September 2022 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ilf@zeromail.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4EDC14F73B for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 13:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kghhEIpu3_CQ for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 13:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpin.nadir.org (fry.nadir.org [217.114.68.218]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ED54C14EB1C for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 13:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpin.nadir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877197D8D5D for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 22:28:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtpin.nadir.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fry.nadir.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d6-C83wnOmWM for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 22:28:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from snail.zeromail.org (mail.zeromail.org [217.114.68.185]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpin.nadir.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECF067D62EB for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 22:28:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])ng TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by snail.zeromail.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2EA0BFA6B for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 22:28:49 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 22:28:46 +0200
From: ilf <ilf@zeromail.org>
To: openpgp@ietf.org
Message-ID: <YzX//tPTm4fdHlx5@zeromail.org>
Mail-Followup-To: openpgp@ietf.org
References: <b8ddeb1e-fdbb-edab-3693-722c9e14f3d8@cs.tcd.ie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b8ddeb1e-fdbb-edab-3693-722c9e14f3d8@cs.tcd.ie>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/7SWm_Es8B7hUQas8Q7LAFIrNnV8>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] a new draft overlapping the WG draft
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 20:28:58 -0000

Hi all

I am not a very active contributor to this WG, but I do follow it.

I was really happy when the WG received new energy with the recharter 
two years ago. Many people have worked and contributed a lot since then. 
We now have a solid draft in last call.

I was shocked to read this mail three days ago.

Why is there now a competing draft, rolling back a lot of edits that 
were WG consensus?

It has now been three days, without any explanation.

Werner: What is going on? What are you doing? What are your goals?

Confused and disappointed

-- 
ilf

If you upload your address book to "the cloud", I don't want to be in it.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status