IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] a new draft overlapping the WG draft

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Mon, 10 October 2022 12:34 UTC

Return-Path: <wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498D4C1522DF for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 05:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gnupg.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BZVzUACeFkCT for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 05:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [IPv6:2001:aa8:fff1:100::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE9F4C1522D5 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 05:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnupg.org; s=20181017; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=QCZE6pssBVF7lzvAS6IEAx/PUlIhoc5iiJIGnsUDm60=; b=ZDxD1PdTd/apM2LIX7e6u8PPeM IOgnFOG9ROLJaPUbwrM97dGrN/XY+eJewM1QjcuhFZE3vpsATIHVtgFycBYoLpUVvj84yJQNXwsFL ryqN/6posjgGekZtcZ6D7jBcrvGVcifHBoKCvGQ55zuktpyvf49tvyC3f1P9HU2IjHJY=;
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.89 #1 (Debian)) id 1ohryy-0000Af-Do for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 14:34:08 +0200
Received: from wk by wheatstone.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.92 #5 (Debian)) id 1ohrxA-00080K-66; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 14:32:16 +0200
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: Bart Butler <bartbutler=40protonmail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
References: <b8ddeb1e-fdbb-edab-3693-722c9e14f3d8@cs.tcd.ie> <878rlsc6oe.wl-neal@walfield.org> <CABpKr=0=5w6BBjUBFRXXwqSuL6-S11he-NAS_P4UDO5o+X_4=g@mail.gmail.com> <X5ZBcvHfsi4gesL9P_hrnCsqqsvdBFv0Hic9W5dilIFd8f6fdpo4aQeaK7s8IiURJZHd4Nv5_dcah6OKZGsDA6iZjxtpC9VqXBPVJEu7iPE=@protonmail.com> <r8HV5RWHcsEYe7_yME_OTWCGrK4VR_TtpCmUTCEv1tJehdzPA22CNzO_GbyC9sEmN3YwCQ_88iP-GX3SM34BXb0VDnGuU8HCYxvefqqo4bA=@protonmail.com>
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
Jabber-ID: wk@jabber.gnupg.org
Mail-Followup-To: Bart Butler <bartbutler=40protonmail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "openpgp\@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 14:32:15 +0200
In-Reply-To: <r8HV5RWHcsEYe7_yME_OTWCGrK4VR_TtpCmUTCEv1tJehdzPA22CNzO_GbyC9sEmN3YwCQ_88iP-GX3SM34BXb0VDnGuU8HCYxvefqqo4bA=@protonmail.com> (Bart Butler's message of "Fri, 07 Oct 2022 16:36:44 +0000")
Message-ID: <87wn97g8q8.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=NVD_Gulf_Cartel_Dock_Immigration_Customs_Enforcement_Botnet_Noriega="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/EQC4wCPfwDm-CKLbYLGsOC5hQpE>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] a new draft overlapping the WG draft
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 12:34:17 -0000

On Fri,  7 Oct 2022 16:36, Bart Butler said:

>   * Use the crypto refresh as the starting point

I have not yet fully read the entire draft because a brief reading shows
that it way to complex for an update of OpenPGP.  An update of OpenPGP
to modern algorithms _and_ already implemented extensions was the
original goal for rfc4880bis.  crypto-refresh is something different and
more aligned to ideas floating around here to do everything a new from
scratch.

>   * Add "Literal Data Meta Hash" from draft-koch-openpgp-2015- rfc4880bis

That's actually a gadget I introduced as a counter argument to some
people who consider this a real problem

>   * Remove GCM

Remove that and we are back to the existing AEAD packets.  Fine.

> GnuPG? Note that I do not claim that this is a consensus position, just a
> hypothetical compromise to see where we are.

As I said, I have not read the new v5 things in detail but I can imagine
that we can still change the format.  We have been cautious enough to
tell people that v5 has not yet been finished.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

-- 
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service.             - A. Einstein

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email