IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] a new draft overlapping the WG draft

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Tue, 04 October 2022 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB256C14F744 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 08:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hPh9JfWLqCPD for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 08:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8136DC14F73A for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 08:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Mhhxv6QS8z30m for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 17:50:59 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1664898659; bh=SP4XGV6OKGXogJBHv9hHW+ULRdmkjyX6KTlgQ8MqFTU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=ObISkbkm8LcBui+Un2M7xR54Qhp9s0Blv73SBVvc5l6lrIJ5cKpQCSb3w9YDdZAJ4 ndO1DoRJjvICx1CgPTaBgdR281GiFP+l9qI1ldpbc/SkEB4pLyR9VSw5NL8JDRk4bT 8fOJFcEjnBli3/NGh8VUr8SzKN/vsnqKDblI75Rk=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jUccVtXMHOR4 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 17:50:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 17:50:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DEB8A3EA78D; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 11:50:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6113EA78C for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 11:50:57 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 11:50:57 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: openpgp@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <8735c3d57j.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
Message-ID: <c442996e-8a92-231c-4f8a-5a7b4e188a5d@nohats.ca>
References: <b8ddeb1e-fdbb-edab-3693-722c9e14f3d8@cs.tcd.ie> <SY4PR01MB6251E251B8E78D409D0EB4B6EE559@SY4PR01MB6251.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com> <871qrvn69i.fsf@europ.lan> <877d1ldpqq.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <87v8ozk9on.fsf@europ.lan> <8735c3d57j.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/RNHObPAlvgnJYmudtv6l4UjJ2_I>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] a new draft overlapping the WG draft
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 15:51:08 -0000

On Tue, 4 Oct 2022, Werner Koch wrote:

> what you miss are numerous mails and chats between the editors and the
> chairs after Stephen started the process to re-charter the WG in October
> 2020 and before we hat the DT mailing list.
>
>> So we all agree that GnuPG was well represented in the design team.
>
> No.  I asked Niibe-san to help with the final specification of the curve
> parameters, because he is the one when it comes to implementation
> experience on different platforms.

This was not my understanding. Additionallty, Niibe worked with the
other DT people on all the other things. See his contributions and
approvals on gitlab.

> And only for that because everything
> else was intended as editorial only.  Thus after our successful meeting
> on 2021-08-13 there was nothing contentious anymore left.

That is not how I understood our process to be.

Paul

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status