[openpgp] How to re-launch the OpenPGP WG

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Thu, 12 March 2015 12:36 UTC

Return-Path: <wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185431A005D for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 05:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q44CTe6J99TL for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 05:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [217.69.77.222]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3F391A0013 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 05:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) id 1YW2LY-00054D-SQ for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:36:16 +0100
Received: from wk by vigenere.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.84 #3 (Debian)) id 1YW2H3-0006Ng-JP for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:31:37 +0100
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: openpgp@ietf.org
Organisation: g10 Code GmbH
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
OpenPGP: id=F2AD85AC1E42B367; url=finger:wk@g10code.com
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:31:37 +0100
Message-ID: <878uf2iehi.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/Wr6Eo86wXl4L-eXVwjzoSf8tW6k>
Subject: [openpgp] How to re-launch the OpenPGP WG
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:36:21 -0000

Hi,

Since some time the OpenPGP protocol is again en vogue and the tendency
to prefer S/MIME over OpenPGP is not as strong as it seems to have been
once.  Case in point, the DANE WG has a last call for an OpenPGP DNS
record type.  This is obviously related to OpenPGP and should have been
discussed here as well (actually we did briefly in Summer 2013).

There are several tasks the WG should do:

 - New signature subpackets.  For example one to specify a fingerprint
   and not just the keyid.

 - Take care of individual I-Ds.

 - The use of SHA-1 needs to be replaced.

 - A v5 key format.  Prepare for forthcoming public key algorithms.

 - A new encryption mode to replace our aging CFB+SHA1 method with a
   fast and standard mode.

 - Maybe extend it to key distribution.

Is there any interest in this?
How can we get the WG out of the concluded state? 
Would the Dallas meeting be a starting point for this?
Who would volunteer as Chair?


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.