Re: [openpgp] How to re-launch the OpenPGP WG

David Leon Gil <coruus@gmail.com> Mon, 16 March 2015 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <coruus@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0233B1A9102 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TObTBs5WwFIY for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x230.google.com (mail-yk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B9E21A913D for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykfs63 with SMTP id s63so22904923ykf.2 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gjhF2W/2GfBVPVgXgkuF3NygtFD6+JoSIK4/fCmH5dA=; b=HhXdluiICEjMxJTsP2UZsO4lt3hVCVhlIMf7M7M/sosgAk4v4IPHeOL23EQU2TI3ik rw6/mNbbkGclpJbK4KYf+X8U15RgU3UsE+Y3yxd8uJursAkP7+cL2/j+DLtSKdi2O4do XsTMrBsCfAxoakOJJWhU8fqTUwwYc1i9ENaDbQ+xmUhOr0F+UETtPiqRWYjzTeTpeWCl 6rMSYvOKfNmFI5XzRrH4yvEKav3EOqZfYjz80G35AIZFmkega8Er9sDjtVnARMFM1v4p xWcFCo86bu+etNeUH5e/UsXZzDVAYiNrU0bDiPKCZEf7sdGypK3ULvoMphTlNBaQKQZA gJKA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.170.46.3 with SMTP id 3mr71297338yko.24.1426540739488; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.170.125.80 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <sjmbnjtm5qh.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
References: <878uf2iehi.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <1426218768.22326.80.camel@scientia.net> <874mppgyez.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <sjm3859nhe1.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <CAB5WduAWNbkA6Wv1Es8R1N9EKtHVKedfmzRDc=76oF27AZ6rVw@mail.gmail.com> <877fujdc66.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de> <CAB5WduBtqGPK_F7objx1qcj8MWsME8oQHgs6JmF3AQWnEZU6uA@mail.gmail.com> <CANBiExVYCrT+UtdPjh788kPHAuV7CNXKrxbgOvxcF5Uqj-12Lw@mail.gmail.com> <sjmbnjtm5qh.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:18:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA7UWsVeNSH2wNizQVk2wtWiFv+RjZ3_T-AoVwE9RnK1K2-kfw@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Leon Gil <coruus@gmail.com>
To: Derek Atkins <warlord@mit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11437dca08f11105116e6612"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/g6_8YP7aJjybMXNAGpt8RskOvCc>
Cc: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>, Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>, "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>, DataPacRat <datapacrat@gmail.com>, "jh@jameshoward.us" <jh@jameshoward.us>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] How to re-launch the OpenPGP WG
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:19:02 -0000

On Monday, March 16, 2015, Derek Atkins <warlord@mit.edu> wrote:

> "James P. Howard" <jh@jameshoward.us <javascript:;>> writes:
>
> > Is there an upvote button for this?  I even tweeted about this yesterday!
> >
> >   https://twitter.com/howardjp/status/576473455949967360
> >
> > The current signed-XML standard is an awful awful thing and having a
> usable
> > standard for signed text formats (XML, JSON, whatever) would would make
> the
> > implementation a de facto default.
>
> Have you looked a JOSE?
>
> I think this would be out of scope for OpenPGP.
>
> > James Howard
>
> -derek
>

One, quite viable, option might be to use a subset of JOSE for OpenPGPv5.