IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] Manifesto - who is the new OpenPGP for?

Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net> Thu, 26 March 2015 23:58 UTC

Return-Path: <calestyo@scientia.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D1A1A86FA for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RUscztjmRpcR for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw01.dd24.net (mailgw-01.dd24.net [193.46.215.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FDD11A700F for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailpolicy-01.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net (mailpolicy-02.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net [192.168.1.27]) by mailgw01.dd24.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC67E5FC38 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 23:58:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mailpolicy-02.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net
Received: from mailgw01.dd24.net ([192.168.1.35]) by mailpolicy-01.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net (mailpolicy-02.live.igb.homer.key-systems.net [192.168.1.25]) (amavisd-new, port 10235) with ESMTP id MjNySRLVsg8y for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 23:58:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from heisenberg.fritz.box (ppp-188-174-180-118.dynamic.mnet-online.de [188.174.180.118]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgw01.dd24.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 23:58:24 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1427414303.24976.2.camel@scientia.net>
From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
To: openpgp@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:58:23 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87fv8sgj9l.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
References: <CAA7UWsUz65C0GAQo8Yf7ZOeT9BYy+NLV5pbbPg+Ok0-72ca1eA@mail.gmail.com> <1426721882.4249.72.camel@scientia.net> <5510578A.80304@iang.org> <1427140788.10191.75.camel@scientia.net> <5510B7CF.8060308@iang.org> <1427168189.10191.241.camel@scientia.net> <5511FE82.6010807@iang.org> <1427243451.10191.375.camel@scientia.net> <5512F137.80702@iang.org> <CAHBU6isgirHnx+gHP+OiHuvhzD+1OTCShCHEkhWcqEmUn9qnzQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwiXKf1DvgbHaZoJnKdCVbak-jderv6Z8KDs9xPEbUuYQQ@mail.gmail.com> <1427343948.23692.14.camel@scientia.net> <87fv8sgj9l.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="sha-512"; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; boundary="=-G3vmWw20B3fLfuwWx0xZ"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/uuEDeD6ie6iKEeXpC8T_HIC7UDc>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Manifesto - who is the new OpenPGP for?
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 23:58:29 -0000

On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 11:12 +0100, Werner Koch wrote: 
> The OpenPGP protocol does not specify any trust model.  It provides just
> the features to build a PKI.  Some use the WoT, others build a X.509
> alike system, some do not care at all, or use an ssh like non-PKI.
Sure, I primarily meant, "if the goal is to modify OpenPGP such way,
that what we can do now is no longer possible" :)


Cheers,
Chris.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email