IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] network management data models - a rewrite

"Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> Thu, 17 November 2011 07:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E5B11E80D8 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:42:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.576
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.576 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.023, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fg+LlHkmw4hI for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:42:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E98411E814E for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:42:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id pAH7g1A3010137 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:42:01 +0100
Received: from DEMUEXC047.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.32.93]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id pAH7g1Y9031757; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:42:01 +0100
Received: from DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.18]) by DEMUEXC047.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:42:01 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:41:59 +0100
Message-ID: <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A640301A2E6@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <20111117071144.GG26328@elstar.local>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] network management data models - a rewrite
Thread-Index: Acyk+DVNlGHjS4NUTjCsK90kcZ5sqwAA8yOw
References: <20111117041857.GA25801@elstar.local> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A640301A26B@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <988EAE3D-D019-4B7C-92EB-A6780DA3D376@asgaard.org> <20111117064742.GB26328@elstar.local> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A640301A290@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <20111117071144.GG26328@elstar.local>
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Nov 2011 07:42:01.0176 (UTC) FILETIME=[64808580:01CCA4FC]
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <cdl@asgaard.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] network management data models - a rewrite
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:42:08 -0000

> One more example: Look at section 4.3 Accounting Management providing
> a list of different IPFIX information elements. Is that the level of
> detail you find appropriate? How many of the information elements
> listed there do you think are important for Accounting Management? Do
> you propose to have the IEs listed as well in sections 4.1 Fault
> Management, 4.4 Performance Management, and 4.5 Security Management?

I tend to agree that the IPFIX IEs are not needed in this level of
detail.
Benoit promised to provide an update.

Mehmet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email