IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] network management data models - a rewrite

"Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net> Thu, 17 November 2011 06:58 UTC

Return-Path: <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C80C1F0C42 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:58:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.54
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.54 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.059, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c5KA7N22Sw-A for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:58:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from postgirl.ripe.net (postgirl.ipv6.ripe.net [IPv6:2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1342]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D585A11E8083 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:58:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dodo.ripe.net ([193.0.23.4]) by postgirl.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bertietf@bwijnen.net>) id 1RQvvJ-0003kS-Vk; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:58:15 +0100
Received: from dog.ripe.net ([193.0.1.217] helo=dhcp-538f.meeting.ietf.org) by dodo.ripe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bertietf@bwijnen.net>) id 1RQvvJ-0007pE-CE; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:58:13 +0100
Message-ID: <4EC4B07F.2000303@bwijnen.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:58:07 +0800
From: "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <cdl@asgaard.org>
References: <20111117041857.GA25801@elstar.local> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A640301A26B@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <988EAE3D-D019-4B7C-92EB-A6780DA3D376@asgaard.org>
In-Reply-To: <988EAE3D-D019-4B7C-92EB-A6780DA3D376@asgaard.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: --
X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points: -2.9 points pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------ -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000]
X-RIPE-Signature: 86ab03e524994f79ca2c75a176445dd485f8ad51fe4e7fccf2968fcc3b5e38e3
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] network management data models - a rewrite
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:58:18 -0000

I like Juergens contribution.

And although I agree that some text on how our stuff
relates to FCAPS might be good, I would not dwell on it
too much.

Bert

On 11/17/11 2:25 PM, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE wrote:
> 	If anyone else in the group has a feeling on this topic, please speak up on the list in short order.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email